Literature DB >> 25883071

Clinical Decision Making in a Patient with Stage 5 CKD--Is eGFR Good Enough?

Jeffrey S Berns1.   

Abstract

The development and widespread use of serum creatinine concentration-based prediction equations to calculate eGFR have been major advances for detection of patients with CKD and the epidemiologic study of CKD and its outcomes. However, these equations as well as those that also incorporate serum cystatin C concentration provide GFR estimates that, although reasonably precise on average, can differ markedly and in clinically important ways from actual GFR. Thus, it is important that clinicians who use these equations for clinical decision-making be familiar with their strengths and weaknesses and have an appreciation of their potential for error. More precise knowledge of actual GFR is important in certain clinical circumstances, including, as presented in this Attending Rounds, patients with stage 5 CKD, in whom decisions regarding dialysis initiation are necessary. Nephrologists should have the ability to accurately determine GFR when needed if clinical circumstances suggest inaccuracy of the calculated eGFR reported by the clinical laboratory.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CKD; Cockcroft–Gault; ESRD; GFR

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25883071      PMCID: PMC4633779          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00340115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  72 in total

1.  THE MEASUREMENT OF THE TUBULAR EXCRETORY MASS, EFFECTIVE BLOOD FLOW AND FILTRATION RATE IN THE NORMAL HUMAN KIDNEY.

Authors:  H W Smith; W Goldring; H Chasis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1938-05       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  A new quantitative method for estimating glomerular filtration rate and its clinical value.

Authors:  Mu-Hua Cheng; Feng-Wei Zeng; Liang-Jun Xie; Jian-Fang Li; Feng Zhang; Hang Jiang
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 3.  Measuring GFR: a systematic review.

Authors:  Inga Soveri; Ulla B Berg; Jonas Björk; Carl-Gustaf Elinder; Anders Grubb; Ingegerd Mejare; Gunnar Sterner; Sten-Erik Bäck
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Effect of Genetic African Ancestry on eGFR and Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Miriam S Udler; Girish N Nadkarni; Gillian Belbin; Vaneet Lotay; Christina Wyatt; Omri Gottesman; Erwin P Bottinger; Eimear E Kenny; Inga Peter
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  The revised Lund-Malmö GFR estimating equation outperforms MDRD and CKD-EPI across GFR, age and BMI intervals in a large Swedish population.

Authors:  Ulf Nyman; Anders Grubb; Anders Larsson; Lars-Olof Hansson; Mats Flodin; Gunnar Nordin; Veronica Lindström; Jonas Björk
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function.

Authors:  Marc Froissart; Jerome Rossert; Christian Jacquot; Michel Paillard; Pascal Houillier
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Glomerular filtration rate-estimating equations for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Marie Evans; Karlijn J van Stralen; Staffan Schön; Karl-Göran Prütz; Maria Stendahl; Bengt Rippe; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Jane Manzi; Frederick Van Lente; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cimetidine improves the reliability of creatinine as a marker of glomerular filtration.

Authors:  L B Hilbrands; M A Artz; J F Wetzels; R A Koene
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate: Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas compared to renal inulin clearance.

Authors:  Rossini Botev; Jean-Pierre Mallié; Cecilé Couchoud; Otto Schück; Jean-Pierre Fauvel; Jack F M Wetzels; Nelson Lee; Natale G De Santo; Massimo Cirillo
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying Glomerular Filtration Rates in Acute Kidney Injury: A Requirement for Translational Success.

Authors:  Bruce A Molitoris; Erinn S Reilly
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 2.  Rethinking CKD Evaluation: Should We Be Quantifying Basal or Stimulated GFR to Maximize Precision and Sensitivity?

Authors:  Bruce A Molitoris
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  CKD to ESRD transition: does assessment of kidney function matter?

Authors:  Tariq Shafi
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 7.186

4.  An Equation Based on Fuzzy Mathematics to Assess the Timing of Haemodialysis Initiation.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Degang Wang; Xiangmei Chen; Xuefeng Sun; Wenyan Song; Hongli Jiang; Wei Shi; Wenhu Liu; Ping Fu; Xiaoqiang Ding; Ming Chang; Xueqing Yu; Ning Cao; Menghua Chen; Zhaohui Ni; Jing Cheng; Shiren Sun; Huimin Wang; Yunyan Wang; Bihu Gao; Jianqin Wang; Lirong Hao; Suhua Li; Qiang He; Hongmei Liu; Fengmin Shao; Wei Li; Yang Wang; Lynda Szczech; Qiuxia Lv; Xianfeng Han; Luping Wang; Ming Fang; Zach Odeh; Ximing Sun; Hongli Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluation and enhancement of standard equations for renal function estimation in individuals with components of metabolic disease.

Authors:  Luigi Brunetti; Hyunmoon Back; Sijia Yu; Urma Jalil; Leonid Kagan
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.