Literature DB >> 20831503

Influence of MLC leaf width on biologically adapted IMRT plans.

Jan Rødal1, Aste Søvik, Eirik Malinen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High resolution beam delivery may be required for optimal biology-guided adaptive therapy. In this work, we have studied the influence of multi leaf collimator (MLC) leaf widths on the treatment outcome following adapted IMRT of a hypoxic tumour.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dynamic contrast enhanced MR images of a dog with a spontaneous tumour in the nasal region were used to create a tentative hypoxia map following a previously published procedure. The hypoxia map was used as a basis for generating compartmental gross tumour volumes, which were utilised as planning structures in biologically adapted IMRT. Three different MLCs were employed in inverse treatment planning, with leaf widths of 2.5 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm. The number of treatment beams and the degree of step-and-shoot beam modulation were varied. By optimising the tumour control probability (TCP) function, optimal compartmental doses were derived and used as target doses in the inverse planning. Resulting IMRT dose distributions and dose volume histograms (DVHs) were exported and analysed, giving estimates of TCP and compartmental equivalent uniform doses (EUDs). The impact of patient setup accuracy was simulated.
RESULTS: The MLC with the smallest leaf width (2.5 mm) consistently gave the highest TCPs and compartmental EUDs, assuming no setup error. The difference between this MLC and the 5 mm MLC was rather small, while the MLC with 10 mm leaf width gave considerably lower TCPs. When including random and systematic setup errors, errors larger than 5 mm gave only small differences between the MLC types. For setup errors larger than 7 mm no differences were found between non-uniform and uniform dose distributions.
CONCLUSIONS: Biologically adapted radiotherapy may require MLCs with leaf widths smaller than 10 mm. However, for a high probability of cure it is crucial that accurate patient setup is ensured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20831503     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.498832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  5 in total

1.  Treatment plan comparison between Tri-Co-60 magnetic-resonance image-guided radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; So-Yeon Park; Chang Heon Choi; Minsoo Chun; Jin Ho Kim; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-08

2.  Comparison of treatment plans between IMRT with MR-linac and VMAT for lung SABR.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; Hong-Gyun Wu; Hak Jae Kim; Chang Heon Choi; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Is High Definition MLC Dosimetrically Superior to Standard Definition MLC for SIB-SBRT for Carcinoma Prostate.

Authors:  Bijina T K; K M Ganesh; Pichandi A
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-12-01

4.  An investigation of the conformity, feasibility, and expected clinical benefits of multiparametric MRI-guided dose painting radiotherapy in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Caterina Brighi; Paul J Keall; Lois C Holloway; Amy Walker; Brendan Whelan; Philip C de Witt Hamer; Niels Verburg; Farhannah Aly; Cathy Chen; Eng-Siew Koh; David E J Waddington
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  The effect of extremely narrow MLC leaf width on the plan quality of VMAT for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; So-Yeon Park; Jin Ho Kim; Joel Carlson; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.