Literature DB >> 20829534

Bone metastases from prostate cancer: assessing treatment response by using diffusion-weighted imaging and functional diffusion maps--initial observations.

Carolin Reischauer1, Johannes M Froehlich, Dow-Mu Koh, Nicole Graf, Christian Padevit, Hubert John, Christoph A Binkert, Peter Boesiger, Andreas Gutzeit.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate and monitor the response to antiandrogen treatment of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and functional diffusion maps (DMs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Nine treatment-naive men (mean age, 73 years; range, 66-86 years) with 20 pelvic bone metastases were included. Imaging was performed before antiandrogen treatment and at 1, 2, and 3 months afterward. Imaging included a DW MR imaging sequence with five b factors (0-800 sec/mm²). Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and mean ADCs of each metastasis were measured over time and analyzed by using the general linear model. Pairwise comparisons (paired-samples t tests) of PSA levels and ADCs before and after therapy were performed with the significance level set at P < .017 (Bonferroni correction). To determine the relationship between serum PSA level and the averaged mean ADCs in each patient, the two parameters were correlated across time. In addition, an analysis with functional DMs was performed to evaluate ADC response to treatment on a per-voxel basis.
RESULTS: Serum PSA levels decreased by more than 90% during therapy. The mean ADCs of metastases were increased significantly at 1 (P < .001), 2 (P = .002), and 3 (P = .011) months after therapy compared with pretreatment values. Heterogeneous response was revealed at functional DM analysis. After 1 month of therapy, 47.3% of all analyzed tumor voxels showed significantly increased ADCs, while 46.5% were unchanged and 6.2% exhibited decreased ADCs in comparison to the pretreatment values. At 3 months after therapy, the proportion of voxels showing ADC decrease was higher (13.7%) than that at 1 month.
CONCLUSION: DW MR imaging allows monitoring of antiandrogen therapy in bone metastases. PSA level decrease corresponded well with an increase in mean tumor ADC. Heterogeneity of tumor response to therapy was demonstrated by functional DM analysis. © RSNA, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20829534     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  51 in total

1.  Optimising diffusion weighted MRI for imaging metastatic and myeloma bone disease and assessing reproducibility.

Authors:  C Messiou; D J Collins; V A Morgan; N M Desouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  MRI for response assessment in metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  F E Lecouvet; A Larbi; V Pasoglou; P Omoumi; B Tombal; N Michoux; J Malghem; R Lhommel; B C Vande Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The isotope bone scan: we can do better.

Authors:  Ignac Fogelman; Glen M Blake; Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  The emerging role of diffusion-weighted MRI in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Edward M Lawrence; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Andrew N Priest; Evis Sala
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Diffusion-weighted Imaging as a Treatment Response Biomarker for Evaluating Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Raquel Perez-Lopez; Joaquin Mateo; Helen Mossop; Matthew D Blackledge; David J Collins; Mihaela Rata; Veronica A Morgan; Alison Macdonald; Shahneen Sandhu; David Lorente; Pasquale Rescigno; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Diletta Bianchini; Nuria Porta; Emma Hall; Martin O Leach; Johann S de Bono; Dow-Mu Koh; Nina Tunariu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Diagnostic imaging to detect and evaluate response to therapy in bone metastases from prostate cancer: current modalities and new horizons.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Francesco Bertoldo; Francesco Boccardo; Giario Conti; Ilario Menchi; Francesco Mungai; Umberto Ricardi; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI in the assessment of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Michele Anzidei; Alessandro Napoli; Beatrice Sacconi; Fabrizio Boni; Vincenzo Noce; Michele Di Martino; Luca Saba; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  [Imaging diagnostics of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; M Seitz; A Graser; C G Stief; D Tilki
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.

Authors:  C J Galbán; B A Hoff; T L Chenevert; B D Ross
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.