BACKGROUND: Little information is known about the frequency, types and causes of diagnostic errors in imaging children. OBJECTIVE: Our goals were to describe the patterns and potential etiologies of diagnostic error in our subspecialty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 265 cases with clinically significant diagnostic errors identified during a 10-year period. Errors were defined as a diagnosis that was delayed, wrong or missed; they were classified as perceptual, cognitive, system-related or unavoidable; and they were evaluated by imaging modality and level of training of the physician involved. RESULTS: We identified 484 specific errors in the 265 cases reviewed (mean:1.8 errors/case). Most discrepancies involved staff (45.5%). Two hundred fifty-eight individual cognitive errors were identified in 151 cases (mean = 1.7 errors/case). Of these, 83 cases (55%) had additional perceptual or system-related errors. One hundred sixty-five perceptual errors were identified in 165 cases. Of these, 68 cases (41%) also had cognitive or system-related errors. Fifty-four system-related errors were identified in 46 cases (mean = 1.2 errors/case) of which all were multi-factorial. Seven cases were unavoidable. CONCLUSION: Our study defines a taxonomy of diagnostic errors in a large academic pediatric radiology practice and suggests that most are multi-factorial in etiology. Further study is needed to define effective strategies for improvement.
BACKGROUND: Little information is known about the frequency, types and causes of diagnostic errors in imaging children. OBJECTIVE: Our goals were to describe the patterns and potential etiologies of diagnostic error in our subspecialty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 265 cases with clinically significant diagnostic errors identified during a 10-year period. Errors were defined as a diagnosis that was delayed, wrong or missed; they were classified as perceptual, cognitive, system-related or unavoidable; and they were evaluated by imaging modality and level of training of the physician involved. RESULTS: We identified 484 specific errors in the 265 cases reviewed (mean:1.8 errors/case). Most discrepancies involved staff (45.5%). Two hundred fifty-eight individual cognitive errors were identified in 151 cases (mean = 1.7 errors/case). Of these, 83 cases (55%) had additional perceptual or system-related errors. One hundred sixty-five perceptual errors were identified in 165 cases. Of these, 68 cases (41%) also had cognitive or system-related errors. Fifty-four system-related errors were identified in 46 cases (mean = 1.2 errors/case) of which all were multi-factorial. Seven cases were unavoidable. CONCLUSION: Our study defines a taxonomy of diagnostic errors in a large academic pediatric radiology practice and suggests that most are multi-factorial in etiology. Further study is needed to define effective strategies for improvement.
Authors: V Bolón-Canedo; E Ataer-Cansizoglu; D Erdogmus; J Kalpathy-Cramer; O Fontenla-Romero; A Alonso-Betanzos; M F Chiang Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Ruth Batty; Mary L Gawne-Cain; Cara Mooney; Laura Mandefield; Michael Bradburn; Gerald Mason; Paul D Griffiths Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315