Literature DB >> 12369156

The Veterans Affairs root cause analysis system in action.

James P Bagian1, John Gosbee, Caryl Z Lee, Linda Williams, Scott D McKnight, Dea M Mannos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patient safety program in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began in 1998, when the National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS) was established to lead the effort on a day-to-day basis. NCPS provides the structure, training, and tools, and VA facilities provide front-line expertise, feedback about the process, and root cause analysis (RCA) of adverse events and close calls. MONITORING THE PROCESS: Facility patient safety managers determine the disposition of adverse events and close calls occurring at their facilities. They use a safety assessment code (SAC) to prioritize the actual and potential severity and frequency of an event. BEFORE-AND-AFTER STUDY: Before the new RCA system was implemented in 2000, the VA used another adverse event reporting system, focused review (FR). A comparison of the two processes indicates that the RCA process has shifted analyses of adverse events toward a human factors engineering approach-entailing a search for system vulnerabilities rather than human errors and other less actionable root causes. CASE EXAMPLES: Two case examples--on hazards in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) room and on a cardiac pacemaker malfunction--illustrate how the RCA system works in actual operation. The cases illustrate that broadly applicable, high-impact actions can result from a thorough RCA process. DISCUSSION: NCPS monitors the quality and completeness of RCAs through the immediate review and feedback process. Still to be investigated is the effectiveness of RCA actions addressing the hypothesized root causes and contributing factors of the close calls and adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12369156     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28057-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  42 in total

1.  Coverage of patient safety terms in the UMLS metathesaurus.

Authors:  Aziz A Boxwala; Qing T Zeng; Anthony Chamberas; Luke Sato; Meghan Dierks
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Key performance outcomes of patient safety curricula: root cause analysis, failure mode and effects analysis, and structured communications skills.

Authors:  William E Fassett
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Diagnostic errors in pediatric radiology.

Authors:  George A Taylor; Stephan D Voss; Patrice R Melvin; Dionne A Graham
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-09-09

4.  Beyond patient safety Flatland.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Improving patient safety in hospitals: Contributions of high-reliability theory and normal accident theory.

Authors:  Michal Tamuz; Michael I Harrison
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Fair and just culture, team behavior, and leadership engagement: The tools to achieve high reliability.

Authors:  Allan S Frankel; Michael W Leonard; Charles R Denham
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  A string of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Anton J Kuzel; Susan M Dovey; Robert L Phillips
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Organization and representation of patient safety data: current status and issues around generalizability and scalability.

Authors:  Aziz A Boxwala; Meghan Dierks; Maura Keenan; Susan Jackson; Robert Hanscom; David W Bates; Luke Sato
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  [Patient safety: data on the topic and ways out of the crisis].

Authors:  M Rall
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Lindsey Wilson; Laura A Petersen; Mona K Sawhney; Brian Reis; Donna Espadas; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.