BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence on the association of individual antioxidant vitamins and cognition is inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the total antioxidant capacity of diets on the basis of the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay in relation to cognition in older women. DESIGN: Starting in 1995, we used a telephone-based cognitive assessment to evaluate cognitive function on 3 occasions at 2-y intervals in 16,010 participants aged ≥70 y in the Nurses' Health Study. In 1980, and every 4 y thereafter, we collected dietary information by using a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ). For each participant, we combined FFQ data with food- and supplement-specific FRAP values to obtain FRAP scores; these data were averaged from 1980 until the initial cognitive interview to reflect long-term diets. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regression to estimate mean differences in initial cognitive function and slopes of decline across quintiles of FRAP scores. RESULTS: In multivariable-adjusted models, there was an association between higher total FRAP scores and better cognitive function at the first interview (P for trend = 0.003 for global scores with all cognitive tests combined; mean difference = 0.04 standard units; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.08 standard units, comparing the highest and lowest quintiles). A weaker association was observed for dietary FRAP scores (excluding supplements) and initial global scores (P for trend = 0.05). However, prospective analyses of cognitive decline indicated no associations with total or dietary FRAP scores in models adjusted for multiple potential confounders (P for trend = 0.3 and 0.5 for global scores, respectively). CONCLUSION: We observed no clear evidence of a consistent association between the total antioxidant capacity of diets and cognition in this cohort of older women.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence on the association of individual antioxidant vitamins and cognition is inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the total antioxidant capacity of diets on the basis of the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay in relation to cognition in older women. DESIGN: Starting in 1995, we used a telephone-based cognitive assessment to evaluate cognitive function on 3 occasions at 2-y intervals in 16,010 participants aged ≥70 y in the Nurses' Health Study. In 1980, and every 4 y thereafter, we collected dietary information by using a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ). For each participant, we combined FFQ data with food- and supplement-specific FRAP values to obtain FRAP scores; these data were averaged from 1980 until the initial cognitive interview to reflect long-term diets. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regression to estimate mean differences in initial cognitive function and slopes of decline across quintiles of FRAP scores. RESULTS: In multivariable-adjusted models, there was an association between higher total FRAP scores and better cognitive function at the first interview (P for trend = 0.003 for global scores with all cognitive tests combined; mean difference = 0.04 standard units; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.08 standard units, comparing the highest and lowest quintiles). A weaker association was observed for dietary FRAP scores (excluding supplements) and initial global scores (P for trend = 0.05). However, prospective analyses of cognitive decline indicated no associations with total or dietary FRAP scores in models adjusted for multiple potential confounders (P for trend = 0.3 and 0.5 for global scores, respectively). CONCLUSION: We observed no clear evidence of a consistent association between the total antioxidant capacity of diets and cognition in this cohort of older women.
Authors: W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Antonio Agudo; Laia Cabrera; Pilar Amiano; Eva Ardanaz; Aurelio Barricarte; Toni Berenguer; María D Chirlaque; Miren Dorronsoro; Paula Jakszyn; Nerea Larrañaga; Carmen Martínez; Carmen Navarro; Jose R Quirós; María J Sánchez; María J Tormo; Carlos A González Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: H J Wengreen; R G Munger; C D Corcoran; P Zandi; K M Hayden; M Fotuhi; I Skoog; M C Norton; J Tschanz; J C S Breitner; K A Welsh-Bohmer Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: May A Beydoun; Marie T Fanelli-Kuczmarski; Melissa H Kitner-Triolo; Hind A Beydoun; Jay S Kaufman; Marc A Mason; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Elizabeth E Devore; Edith Feskens; M Arfan Ikram; Tom den Heijer; Meike Vernooij; Fedde van der Lijn; Albert Hofman; Wiro J Niessen; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M D López-Avalos; R Fernández-Llebrez Zayas; M Cifuentes; M V De Andrés; P Fernández-Llebrez Del Rey; J M Grondona; M Pérez-Martín; C Pedraza Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Francine Grodstein; Jacqueline O'Brien; Jae Hee Kang; Rimma Dushkes; Nancy R Cook; Olivia Okereke; JoAnn E Manson; Robert J Glynn; Julie E Buring; Michael Gaziano; Howard D Sesso Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Leah H Rubin; Deborah R Gustafson; Lakshmi Warrior; Lila Sheira; Kathryn C Fitzgerald; Raha Dastgheyb; Kathleen M Weber; Phyllis C Tien; Audrey French; Amanda B Spence; Anjali Sharma; Dionna W Williams; Cory J White; Eric C Seaberg; Edward A Frongillo; Sheri D Weiser Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 8.472