Literature DB >> 20825769

Accuracy of radiographic readings in the emergency department.

Bruno Petinaux1, Rahul Bhat, Keith Boniface, Jaime Aristizabal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A review of radiology discrepancies of emergency department (ED) radiograph interpretations was undertaken to examine the types of error made by emergency physicians (EPs).
METHODS: An ED quality assurance database containing all radiology discrepancies between the EP and radiology from June 1996 to May 2005 was reviewed. The discrepancies were categorized as bone, chest (CXR), and abdomen (AXR) radiographs and examined to identify abnormalities missed by EPs.
RESULTS: During the study period, the ED ordered approximately 151 693 radiographs. Of the total, 4605 studies were identified by radiology as having a total of 5308 abnormalities discordant from the EP interpretation. Three hundred fifty-nine of these abnormalities were not confirmed by the radiologist (false positive). The remainder of the discordant studies represented abnormalities identified by the radiologist and missed by the EP (false negatives). Of these false-negative studies, 1954 bone radiographs (2.4% of bone x-rays ordered) had missed findings with 2050 abnormalities; the most common missed findings were fractures and dislocations. Of the 220 AXRs (3.7% of AXRs ordered) with missed findings, 240 abnormalities were missed; the most common of these was bowel obstruction. Of the 2431 CXRs (3.8% of CXRs ordered), 2659 abnormalities were missed; the most common were air-space disease and pulmonary nodules. The rate of discrepancies potentially needing emergent change in management based solely on a radiographic discrepancy was 85 of 151 693 x-rays (0.056%).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3% of radiographs interpreted by EPs are subsequently given a discrepant interpretation by the radiology attending. The most commonly missed findings included fractures, dislocations, air-space disease, and pulmonary nodules. Continuing education should focus on these areas to attempt to further reduce this error rate.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825769     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  18 in total

1.  Anatomical and/or pathological predictors for the "incorrect" classification of red dot markers on wrist radiographs taken following trauma.

Authors:  R Kranz; P Cosson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Validation of a clinical decision rule: chest X-ray in patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Romi Goldschlager; Hedley Roth; Jarryd Solomon; Scott Robson; Jessica Green; Sarah Green; Manfred Spanger; Robyn Gunn; Peter Cameron
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-03-05

3.  Musculoskeletal Radiology Reports: Overlooked or Valuable?

Authors:  Sadaf Sahraian; Matthew D Alvin; Arya Haj-Mirzaian; Rozita Jalilianhasanpour; Elham Beheshtian; Evan Honig; Mona Shahriari; Mert Uzner; Shadpour Demehri; David M Yousem
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Fracture Detection and Localization on Wrist Radiographs.

Authors:  Yee Liang Thian; Yiting Li; Pooja Jagmohan; David Sia; Vincent Ern Yao Chan; Robby T Tan
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-01-30

5.  Comparing the interpretation of traumatic chest x-ray by emergency medicine specialists and radiologists.

Authors:  Saeed Safari; Alireza Baratloo; Ahmed Said Negida; Morteza Sanei Taheri; Behrooz Hashemi; Samaneh Hosseini Selkisari
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2014-11-18

6.  Radiology of Fractures in Intoxicated Emergency Department Patients: Locations, Mechanisms, Presentation, and Initial Interpretation Accuracy.

Authors:  Yuka Morita; Taiki Nozaki; Jay Starkey; Yuka Okajima; Sachiko Ohde; Masaki Matsusako; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Yukihisa Saida; Yasuyuki Kurihara
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Radiologic discrepancies in diagnosis of fractures in a Dutch teaching emergency department: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Laura Mattijssen-Horstink; Judith Joëlle Langeraar; Gert Jan Mauritz; William van der Stappen; Maarten Baggelaar; Edward Camillus Thwan Han Tan
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  The impact of immediate reporting on interpretive discrepancies and patient referral pathways within the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Hardy; B Snaith; A Scally
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Establishment and implementation of an effective rule for the interpretation of computed tomography scans by emergency physicians in blunt trauma.

Authors:  Yukihiro Ikegami; Tsuyoshi Suzuki; Chiaki Nemoto; Yasuhiko Tsukada; Arifumi Hasegawa; Jiro Shimada; Choichiro Tase
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Now you see me: a pragmatic cohort study comparing first and final radiological diagnoses in the emergency department.

Authors:  Björn Mattsson; David Ertman; Aristomenis Konstantinos Exadaktylos; Luca Martinolli; Wolf E Hautz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.