Literature DB >> 24595499

Validation of a clinical decision rule: chest X-ray in patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.

Romi Goldschlager1, Hedley Roth, Jarryd Solomon, Scott Robson, Jessica Green, Sarah Green, Manfred Spanger, Robyn Gunn, Peter Cameron.   

Abstract

Current literature suggests that a large proportion of chest X-rays (CXRs) performed in emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain and suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are unnecessary. The Canadian ACS Guidelines aim to guide clinicians in the appropriate use of CXR within this patient population. This study determined the prevalence of clinically significant CXR abnormalities and assessed the utility of the guidelines in a population of ED patients with chest pain and suspected ACS. Included in the study were participants over the age of 18 who presented to an Australian metropolitan ED, over a 1-year period, with a primary complaint of chest pain and who had a CXR and troponin level ordered in the ED (N = 760). We retrospectively compared their radiographic findings with their recommendations for CXR according to the ACS Guidelines. We found that 12 % of the participants had a clinically significant chest X-ray. The guidelines had a sensitivity of 80 % (95 % CI 0.70-0.87) and specificity of 50 % (95 % CI 0.47-0.54). The positive predictive value was 18 % (95 % CI 0.15-0.22) with a 95 % negative predictive value (95 % CI 0.92-0.97). Had the ACS guidelines been applied to our patient population, the number of CXR performed would have been reduced by 47 %. This study suggests that the ACS Guidelines has the potential to reduce the numbers of unnecessary CXR performed in ED patients. However, this would come at the expense of missing a minority of significant CXR abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595499     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-014-1203-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  10 in total

1.  A spreadsheet for the calculation of comprehensive statistics for the assessment of diagnostic tests and inter-rater agreement.

Authors:  A Mackinnon
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  High yield criteria for obtaining non-trauma chest radiography in the adult emergency department population.

Authors:  Steven G Rothrock; Steven M Green; Krista A Costanzo; Jeanne-Marie Fanelli; Eric S Cruzen; Joseph R Pagane
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.484

3.  Accuracy of radiographic readings in the emergency department.

Authors:  Bruno Petinaux; Rahul Bhat; Keith Boniface; Jaime Aristizabal
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Predictors of positive chest radiography in non-traumatic chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Nabil Al Zadjali; Rasha Al-Senawi; Abdullah Al Reesi; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Joe Nemeth; Jeffrey J Perry
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2009-01

5.  Emergency physicians' fear of malpractice in evaluating patients with possible acute cardiac ischemia.

Authors:  David A Katz; Geoffrey C Williams; Roger L Brown; Tom P Aufderheide; Mark Bogner; Peter S Rahko; Harry P Selker
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Derivation of a clinical decision rule for chest radiography in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; Jeffrey J Perry; Pam Ladouceur; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.410

7.  Failure of prospective validation and derivation of a refined clinical decision rule for chest radiography in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Joseph K Poku; Venkatesh R Bellamkonda-Athmaram; M Fernanda Bellolio; M Fernanda Bellolio; David M Nestler; Ian G Stiell; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Is the chest x-ray an appropriate screening exam for ER patients with AMS?

Authors:  Krista L Birkemeier; Michael L Nipper; Jonathan M Williams
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-06-12

9.  Routine chest radiography in uncomplicated suspected acute coronary syndrome rarely yields significant pathology.

Authors:  J J L Ng; D McD Taylor
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  The role of chest radiography in patients presenting with anterior chest pain to the Accident & Emergency Department.

Authors:  N J Russell; C F Pantin; P A Emerson; N J Crichton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 18.000

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.