| Literature DB >> 20825678 |
Aleksandra Klemba1, Magdalena Kowalewska, Wojciech Kukwa, Katarzyna Tonska, Aleksandra Szybinska, Malgorzata Mossakowska, Anna Scinska, Paweł Golik, Kamil Koper, Jakub Radziszewski, Andrzej Kukwa, Anna M Czarnecka, Ewa Bartnik.
Abstract
Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a rare female genital neoplasm. Although numerous molecular changes have been reported in VSCC, biomarkers of clinical relevance are still lacking. On the other hand, there is emerging evidence on the use of mtDNA as a diagnostic tool in oncology. In order to investigate mtDNA status in VSCC patients, haplogroup distribution analysis and D-loop sequencing were performed. The results were compared with available data for the general Polish population, cancer free-centenarians as well as patients with endometrial and head and neck cancer. The obtained data were also compared with the current status of mitochondrial databases. Significant differences in haplogroup distribution between VSCC cohort, general Polish population and cancer-free centenarians cohort were found. Moreover, a correlation between the VSCC patients haplogroup and HPV status was observed. Finally, a specific pattern of mtDNA polymorphisms was found in VSCC. Our results suggest that the mitochondrial genetic background may influence the risk of VSCC occurrence as well as susceptibility to HPV infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20825678 PMCID: PMC2944255 DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-17-73
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1021-7770 Impact factor: 8.410
Clinical characteristics of the investigated group of VSCC patients.
| Parameter | Number of cases | |
|---|---|---|
| <55 | 1(4%) | |
| >55 | 24(96%) | |
| T1 | 4(16%) | |
| T2 | 17(68%) | |
| T3 | 3(12%) | |
| M0 | 25 (100%) | |
| M1 | 0 (0%) | |
| N0 | 15 (60%) | |
| N1 | 4 (16%) | |
| N2 | 1 (4%) | |
| NX | 5 (20%) | |
| positive | 5 (21%) | |
| 16 | 3(12%) | |
| 58 | 1(4,%) | |
| 6 | 1(4%) | |
| negative | 19(79%) | |
*the HPV status of one of the patients was unknown
Primers used in D-loop sequencing.
| Primer name | Primer sequence | Position in mtDNA |
|---|---|---|
| AATGGGCCTGTCCTTGTAG | 15879-15897 | |
| AACGTGTGGGCTATTTAGGC | 16545- 16526 | |
| CGACATCTGGTTCCTACTTC | 16495-16514 | |
| GGGTTTGGTTGGTCCGGG | 559-542 | |
| CGCTTCTGGCCACAGCAC | 315-332 | |
| GGTGTGGCTAGGCTAAGC | 803-786 |
RFLP haplogroup analysis.
| Haplogroup | Polymorphism | Enzyme | Primer F | Primer R | Primer F - sequence | Primer R - sequence | PCR product | RFLP DNA fragments if this haplogroup | RFLP DNA fragments if not this haplogroup | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alu I | 6730F | 7398R | CTATGATATCAATTGGCTTCC | GGCATCCATATAGTCACTCC | 669 | 342, 188, 139 | ||||
| Hinf1 | 11902F | 12328R | GCTAGTCCACGTTCTCCT | TTTGGAGTTGCACCAAGAATT | 427 | 221, 158, 48 | ||||
| HaeII | 8563F | 9231R | ACAATCCTAGGCCTACCCG | GATAGGCATGTGATTGGTGG | 669 | 494, 175 | ||||
| BamHI | 15879F | 16545R | AATGGGCCTGTCCTTGTAG | AACGTGTGGGCTATTTAGGC | 667 | 667 | ||||
| Alu I | 9821F | 10516R | ACTTCACGTCATTATTGGCTC | ATGGAGATGGTAATTGCTAG | 696 | 413, 283 | ||||
| AvaII | 7960F | 8641R | ATTATTCCTAGAACCAGGCG | TGATGAGATATTTGGAGGTGG | 682 | 682 | ||||
| HaeII | 4184F | 4869R | TCCTACCACTCACCCTAGC | GTCATGTGAGAAGAAGCA | 686 | 350, 336 | ||||
| HaeIII | 8563F | 9231R | ACAATCCTAGGCCTACCCG | GATAGGCATGTGATTGGTGG | 669 | 266, 205, 156, 31, 11 | ||||
| AluI | 15372F | 16067R | TAGGAATCACCTCCCATTCC | GTCAATACTTGGGTGGTACC | 696 | 406, 218, 72 | ||||
| BamHI | 12951F | 13614F | CGCTAATCCAAGCCTCACC | TATTCGAGTGCTATAGGCGC | 691 | 416, 248 | ||||
| BstNI | 13568F | 14276R | TTACTCTCATCGCTACCTCC | GGTTGATTCGGGAGGATCC | 709 | 571, 138 | ||||
| Hinf1 | 15879F | 16545R | AATGGGCCTGTCCTTGTAG | AACGTGTGGGCTATTTAGGC | 667 | 602, 65 | ||||
| NlaIII | 4184F | 4869R | TCCTACCACTCACCCTAGC | GTCATGTGAGAAGAAGCA | 686 | 397, 287, 2 | ||||
| DdeI | 1138F | 1801R | GAACACTACGAGCCACAGC | TCATCTTTCCCTTGCGGTAC | 664 | 188, 187, 111, 86, 48, 30, 14 | ||||
| BsmFI | 11765F | 12108R | GCACTCACAGTCGCATCATAA | TTGAGGGATAGGAGGAGAATG | 343 | 343 | ||||
| AluI | 10381F* | 10671R | AAAAAGGATTAGACTGAGCTGA | CGGCAAAGACTAGTATGGCAA | 318 | 219, 72 | ||||
| NlaIII | 4142F | 4379R | GATTCCGCTACGACCAACTC | GCACGGAGAATTTTGGATTC | 197 | 197 | ||||
| MseI | 14642F | 14968R | CCCACACTCAACAGAAACAAA | AGCGGATGATTCAGCCATAA | 346 | 203, 125, 17, 4 | ||||
| PsiI | 1623F | 1909R | GCACCCAACTTACACTTAGGA | TTTCGGGGGTCTTAGCTTT | 287 | 188, 101 | ||||
| NlaIII | 10387F | 10761R | GATTAGACTGAACCGAATTGG | CGGCAAAGACTAGTATGGCAA | 285 | 285 | ||||
| BfaI | 4865F | 5192R | ATGACAAAAACTAGCCCCCA | AGGGTGGATGGAATTAAGGGT | 348 | 337, 11 | ||||
| Mnl I | 5881F | 6254R* | GCCATTTTACCTCACCCCCACTGATGTTCG | TATAGCAGATGCGAGCAGGAGTAGGAGATAGGGA | 374 | 115, 108, 106, 25, 20 |
Restriction enzymes and primers used indicated. * mismatched primers.
Figure 1Haplogroup distribution in the studied group of VSCC patients (A) and haplogroup distribution in control populations: cancer free centenarians - (B) and head and neck cancer patients (C).
Analysis of the specificity of haplogroup distribution in VSCC cohort.
| 7 | 18 | 28% | 0.502 | 0.102 | 0.152 | 0.39 | 0.173 | ||
| 0 | 25 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.194 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 24 | 4% | 0.697 | 0.7 | 0.712 | 1 | 1 | 0.191 | |
| 3 | 22 | 12% | 0.381 | 0.067 | 0.092 | 0.693 | 0.333 | 1 | |
| 1 | 24 | 4% | 1 | 0.547 | 0.552 | ND | 0.613 | 0.61 | |
| 3 | 22 | 12% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.712 | 1 | 0.668 | |
| 8 | 17 | 32% | 0.3 | 0.052 | 0.104 | 0.761 | 0.764 | ||
| 0 | 25 | 0% | 0.368 | 0.385 | 0.389 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 23 | 8% | 0.147 | 0.254 | 0.209 | 0.051 | 0.218 | 1 | |
| 0 | 25 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Haplogroup distribution in VSCC patients cohort was were compared with 1) the general Polish population (p vs PP) [38], 2) population from the Northern Poland (p vs NP) [39], 3) those two populations combined (p vs COMB), 4) cancer free centenarians cohort (p vs CENT), 5) head and neck tumors patients cohort (p vs HNC), and 6) endometrial adenocarcinoma patients cohort (p vs EA) [11]. % positive - percentage of patients carrying particular haplotype in VSCC cohort. Significant differences - bolded: O - overrepresented in VSCC cohort, U - underrepresented in VSCC cohort.
Analysis of the specificity of haplogroup distribution HNC cohort.
| 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.847 | 1 | 0.286 | 0.015 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.197 | 1 | |
| 0.07 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.243 | |
| 0.04 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.677 | 0.184 | |
| 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.065 | 0.065 | ND | 1 | |
| 0.11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0.25 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.053 | 1 | |
| 0 | 0.22 | 0.629 | 0.389 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0.614 | 1 | 1 | 0.227 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Haplogroup distribution in VSCC patients cohort was were compared with 1) the general Polish population (p vs PP) [38], 2) population from the Northern Poland (p vs NP) [39], 3) those two populations combined (p vs COMB), 4) cancer free centenarians cohort (p vs CENT), 5) head and neck tumors patients cohort (p vs HNC), and 6) endometrial adenocarcinoma patients cohort (p vs EA) [11]. % positive - percentage of patients carrying particular haplotype in VSCC cohort. Significant differences - bolded: O - overrepresented in VSCC cohort, U - underrepresented in VSCC cohort.
Comparison of UK super-haplogroup frequency between VSCC and 1) the general Polish population [38], 2) population from Northern Poland [39], and 3) those two populations combined.
| 0.099 | |||
| 0.973 | 0.998 | 1.000 | |
| 0.070 |
Significant differences - bolded.
Germ-line polymorphisms in the D-loop sequence of VSCC patients.
| A > G | 15,16,17,25, 26,27,29,30, | 17 | 309/ | 0.056 | Very common | ||
| A > G | 27 | 1 | 1824/ | 0.432 | Japan Finland, | ||
| G > A | 33 | 1 | Nd | Polymorphism | - | Nd | |
| GCC > DEL GCC | 33 | 1 | Nd | - | Nd | ||
| A > C | 33 | 1 | Nd | Polymorhism | - | Nd | |
| T > C | 15,33,49,51 | 4 | 1/0/ | 0.316 | Africa, Japan, Taiwan, Finland, Italy, Spain, Algerian Jew, India, Polynesia, Caucasi | ||
| C > T | 16,41,50 | 3 | 0/2/1616/ | 1 | China, Japan, Berbers, Italy | ||
| C > T | 16 | 1 | 0/0/1817/ | Polymorphism | 0.484 | Japan, Finland, Sweden, India | |
| T > C | 13,26,33,49 | 4 | 0/0/ | 0.803 | Africa, China, Japan, American, Finland, Italy | ||
| A > G | 26,29 | 2 | 1782/ | 0.271 | Japan, Finland, India | ||
| C > T | 26,29 | 2 | 0/0/1797/ | POLG/PEO muscle | 0.236 | Japan, Indian | |
| Africa, Japan, American, Finland, Italy, Caucasian | |||||||
| T > C | 29 | 1 | 0/0/ | 1.000 | Japan, Finland, India | ||
| T > C | 26,29 | 2 | 0/0/ | 0.679 | Japan, Finland, India | ||
| G > A | 26,29 | 2 | 0.679 | Japan, Finland, India | |||
| C > T | 15 | 1 | 0/0/1854/ | POLG/PEO muscle | 0.148 | ||
| A > G | 13,15,16,17, | 25 | 6/ | 1.000 | Africa, Japan, China, | ||
| C > T | 46 | 1 | 0/0/1860/ | elderly fibroblasts | 0.101 | ||
| C > T | 15 | 1 | 4/0/1788/ | 1.000 | American, Finland, India, Caucasian | ||
| C7 > C8 ins | 16,17,26,28,29,30,38,39,40,41,42,45,51 | 13 | - | Africa, Japan, Taiwan, | |||
| C7 > C9 | 18 | 1 | - | Africa, Japan, Taiwan, | |||
| C5 > C6 | 13,15,16,17, | 25 | - | Africa, Japan, Taiwan, | |||
| A > G | 46 | 1 | 1861/ | Twinkle/PEO frontal cortex | 0.077 | ||
| C > T | 39 | 1 | 1/0/1852/ | 0.181 | |||
| C > T | 15 | 1 | 0/0/2073/ | 0.572 | American, Finland, India, Caucasian | ||
| Africa, China, Japan, | |||||||
| G > A | 50 | 1 | 0.366 | Japan | |||
| CA5 > CA4 | 25,39,41,44, 46 | 5 | - | - | Nd | ||
| CA5 > CA6 | 29,49, | 2 | - | - | Nd | ||
| C > T | 15 | 1 | 0/0/1793/ | 1.000 | American, Caucasian, | ||
| C > A | 45 | 1 | Polymorphism | 0.113 | |||
| T > C | 29 | 1 | 0/0/ | Polymorphism | 0.125 | ||
| T > C | 15,17,25,42,51 | 5 | 0/0/ | 0.069 | China, Japan, American, Finland, Italy, India | ||
| G > A | 33 | 1 | 0.164 | Arica, Japan, America, Italy | |||
| G > A | 15 | 1 | 0.497 | Japan, American, Finland, Italy | |||
| T > C | 15 | 1 | 0/0/ | 0.716 | Japan, Morocco, Finland, Europe | ||
| C > T | 50 | 1 | 0/0/1862/ | Polymorphism | 0.077 | Asia, Austrlia | |
| A > C | 22,41,42,46 | 4 | 1706/1/ | 0.071 | China, Japan, Finland, Taiwan Aborigine, India | ||
| A > C | 41,42 | 2 | 1541/12/ | lung tumor back-mutation, prostate tumor | 0.761 | China, Japan, Finland, Taiwan Aborigine, India | |
| T > CC | 22 | 1 | - | ||||
| T > C | 41,45,42,46 | 4 | 0/0/ | 0.261 | |||
| Japan, Finland, Italy | |||||||
| C > T | 15 | 1 | 0/0/1852/ | 0.192 | American, | ||
| Africa, Japan, China, | |||||||
| T > C | 33,49 | 2 | 0/0/ | 0.652 | Japan, American, Finland, | ||
| T > C | 51 | 1 | 0/0/ | 0.148 | |||
| C > T | 26 | 1 | 0/0/1800/ | 0.602 | China, Japan, Ashkenazi Jews | ||
| T > C | 46 | 1 | 0/0/ | 1.000 | Ethiopia, Japan, Italy | ||
| Japan, Finland, India | |||||||
| C > T | 15 | 1 | 0/0/1756/ | 1.000 | Japan,Taiwan Aborigine, American, India | ||
| C > T | 52 | 1 | 9/4/1820/ | 0.375 | Japan, India | ||
| Finland, Italy, India | |||||||
| C > T | 38 | 1 | 0/3/1816/ | 0.483 | Japan, Italy | ||
| C > T | 26,29 | 2 | 0/2/1801/ | 0.216 | Japan, Finland, Italy | ||
| A > G | 39 | 1 | 1848/ | glioblastoma | 0.214 | ||
| C > T | 17,25,45 | 3 | 0/0/1760/ | - | 1.000 | Japan, American, Finland, Italy | |
| C > T | 17,25 | 2 | 0/0/1823/ | 0.122 | American, Italy, India | ||
| T > C | 42 | 1 | 0/0/ | 0.721 | China, Japan, Finland, American | ||
| A > G | 29 | 1 | 1861/ | 0.089 | |||
| C > T | 39 | 1 | 0/0/1860/ | 0.101 | |||
| T > C | 25 | 1 | 0/0/ | 1.000 | Japan, American, Finland, Italy | ||
| T > C | 33,39,49 | 3 | 0/0/ | 0.602 | Africa, Japan, China, | ||
| T > C | 17 | 1 | 0/0/ | 0.490 | Japan, Taiwan Aborigine | ||
| T > C | 29 | 1 | 0/0/ | Polymorphism | 0.476 | Japan, India | |
| T > C | 22,50, | 2 | 0/0/ | 0.055 | India, Australian, Aboriginee | ||
| India, Australian, Aboriginee | |||||||
| T > C | 49 | 1 | 0/0/ | 0.192 | |||
| A > G | 38,40, | 2 | 1828/ | 0.096 | Japan, Italy | ||
| T > C | 13,17,18,22,25,26,28,29,33,34,41,42,49,50,51 | 15 | 0/0/ | 1.000 | Africa, Japan, Caucasian, China, American, Finland, Italy, India | ||
| G > A | 45 | 1 | 19/1848/0/0/0 | Polymorphism | 0.235 | Finland, Onge | |
Unless stated otherwise, the data are from MITOMAP [63] and mtDB [42] databases.
*-previously not reported, O-overrepresented, U-underrepresented; over and under-represented polymorphisms bolded.
Figure 2D-loop polymorphism distribution in the studied group of VSCC patients 0 - 700 mtDNA bp (A) 16000 - 16659 bp mtDNA (B). × axis - mtDNA position (bp) - polymorphism location. Y axis - number of cases found in this study - polymorphism number.
Polymorphisms found in the coding region of mtDNA of VSCC patients.
| G > A | 17,25,26,29,33, | 8 | 0.053 | Africa, native Americans, Japan, American, Finland, Italy, India | ||
| A > G | 13,15,16,17,18,22,25,26,27,28,29,30,33,34,38,39,40,41,42,44,45,46,49,50,51 | 25 | 22/ | 1.000 | CRS is a rare variant; G is very common in the whole world, A/G is consensus mutation |
HPV infection status and haplogroup co-incidence in VSCC patients.
| HPV total | HPV 16 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | - | + | - | ||||||
| + | 4 | 3 | 7 | p = 0.014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | p = 0.017 | |
| - | 1 | 16 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 17 | |||
| 5 | 19 | 24* | 3 | 21 | 24* | ||||
*- 24 patients were included in the analysis, as in one case the HPV unknown.