BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations, inherited and somatically acquired, are common in clinical prostate cancer. We have developed model systems designed to study specific mtDNA mutations in controlled experiments. Because prostate cancer frequently metastasizes to bone we tested the hypothesis that mtDNA mutations enhance prostate cancer growth and survival in the bone microenvironment. METHODS: The pathogenic nucleotide position (np) 8993 mDNA mutation was introduced into PC3 prostate cancer cells by cybrid formation. Wild-type and mutant cybrids were grown as nude mouse subcutaneous xenografts with or without bone stromal cell co-inoculation. Cybrids were also grown in the intratibial space. Tumor growth was assayed by direct tumor measurement and luciferase chemiluminescence. Gene expression was assayed using cDNA microarrays confirmed by real time PCR, western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Cybrids with the 8,993 mtDNA mutation grew faster than wild-type cybrids. Further growth acceleration was demonstrated in the bone microenvironment. A 37 gene molecular signature characterized the growth advantage conferred by the mtDNA mutation and bone microenvironment. Two genes of known importance in clinical prostate cancer, FGF1 and FAK, were found to be substantially upregulated only when both mtDNA mutation and bone stromal cell were present. CONCLUSIONS: The ATP6 np 8,993 mtDNA mutation confers a growth advantage to human prostate cancer that is most fully manifest in the bone microenvironment. The identification of specific molecular alterations associated with mtDNA mutation and growth in bone may allow new understanding of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations, inherited and somatically acquired, are common in clinical prostate cancer. We have developed model systems designed to study specific mtDNA mutations in controlled experiments. Because prostate cancer frequently metastasizes to bone we tested the hypothesis that mtDNA mutations enhance prostate cancer growth and survival in the bone microenvironment. METHODS: The pathogenic nucleotide position (np) 8993 mDNA mutation was introduced into PC3prostate cancer cells by cybrid formation. Wild-type and mutant cybrids were grown as nude mouse subcutaneous xenografts with or without bone stromal cell co-inoculation. Cybrids were also grown in the intratibial space. Tumor growth was assayed by direct tumor measurement and luciferase chemiluminescence. Gene expression was assayed using cDNA microarrays confirmed by real time PCR, western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Cybrids with the 8,993 mtDNA mutation grew faster than wild-type cybrids. Further growth acceleration was demonstrated in the bone microenvironment. A 37 gene molecular signature characterized the growth advantage conferred by the mtDNA mutation and bone microenvironment. Two genes of known importance in clinical prostate cancer, FGF1 and FAK, were found to be substantially upregulated only when both mtDNA mutation and bone stromal cell were present. CONCLUSIONS: The ATP6 np 8,993 mtDNA mutation confers a growth advantage to humanprostate cancer that is most fully manifest in the bone microenvironment. The identification of specific molecular alterations associated with mtDNA mutation and growth in bone may allow new understanding of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc
Authors: Nitin Jain; Jayant Thatte; Thomas Braciale; Klaus Ley; Michael O'Connell; Jae K Lee Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2003-10-12 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: John A Petros; Amanda K Baumann; Eduardo Ruiz-Pesini; Mahul B Amin; Carrie Qi Sun; John Hall; SoDug Lim; Muta M Issa; W Dana Flanders; Seyed H Hosseini; Fray F Marshall; Douglas C Wallace Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-01-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: T M Horton; J A Petros; A Heddi; J Shoffner; A E Kaufman; S D Graham; T Gramlich; D C Wallace Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: K Polyak; Y Li; H Zhu; C Lengauer; J K Willson; S D Markowitz; M A Trush; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Qiong Liu; Chris T Harvey; Hao Geng; Changhui Xue; Vivian Chen; Tomasz M Beer; David Z Qian Journal: Prostate Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Anna M Czarnecka; Jerzy S Czarnecki; Wojciech Kukwa; Francesco Cappello; Anna Scińska; Andrzej Kukwa Journal: J Biomed Sci Date: 2010-04-25 Impact factor: 8.410
Authors: Aleksandra Klemba; Magdalena Kowalewska; Wojciech Kukwa; Katarzyna Tonska; Aleksandra Szybinska; Malgorzata Mossakowska; Anna Scinska; Paweł Golik; Kamil Koper; Jakub Radziszewski; Andrzej Kukwa; Anna M Czarnecka; Ewa Bartnik Journal: J Biomed Sci Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 8.410