Literature DB >> 20825580

Selective suppression of the incorrect response implementation in choice behavior assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Christophe Tandonnet1, Michael I Garry, Jeffery J Summers.   

Abstract

Selecting the adequate alternative in choice situations may involve an inhibition process. Here we assessed response implementation during the reaction time of a between-hand choice task with single- or paired-pulse (3 or 15 ms interstimulus intervals [ISIs]) transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. The amplitude of the single-pulse motor evoked potential (MEP) initially increased for both hands. At around 130 ms, the single-pulse MEP kept increasing for the responding hand and decreased for the nonresponding hand. The paired-pulse MEP revealed a similar pattern for both ISIs with no effect on short intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation measures. The results suggest that the incorrect response implementation was selectively suppressed before execution of the correct response, preventing errors in choice context. The results favor models assuming that decision making involves an inhibition process.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825580     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01121.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  15 in total

1.  Age-related differences in corticospinal excitability during a choice reaction time task.

Authors:  Koen Cuypers; Herbert Thijs; Julie Duque; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin; Raf L J Meesen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-09-25

2.  Dissociating the role of prefrontal and premotor cortices in controlling inhibitory mechanisms during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ludovica Labruna; Sophie Verset; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation During Actual and Imagined Movements.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Célia Ruffino; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Planning face, hand, and leg movements: anatomical constraints on preparatory inhibition.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Claudia Tischler; Christian Cazares; Ian Greenhouse; Julie Duque; Florent Lebon; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  On the relevance of EEG resting theta activity for the neurophysiological dynamics underlying motor inhibitory control.

Authors:  Charlotte Pscherer; Moritz Mückschel; Lena Summerer; Annet Bluschke; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Leakage of decision uncertainty into movement execution in Parkinson's disease?

Authors:  Peter Praamstra; Andrea F Loing; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Age-related deficits in efficiency of low-level lateral inhibition.

Authors:  Friederike Schlaghecken; Kulbir S Birak; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A Double-Coil TMS Method to Assess Corticospinal Excitability Changes at a Near-Simultaneous Time in the Two Hands during Movement Preparation.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Wilhelm; Caroline Quoilin; Charlotte Petitjean; Julie Duque
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Preventing (impulsive) errors: Electrophysiological evidence for online inhibitory control over incorrect responses.

Authors:  Borís Burle; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Laure Spieser; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.