Literature DB >> 20822530

Standardized ultrasound evaluation of carotid stenosis for clinical trials: University of Washington Ultrasound Reading Center.

Kirk W Beach1, Robert O Bergelin, Daniel F Leotta, Jean F Primozich, P Max Sevareid, Edward T Stutzman, R Eugene Zierler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Serial monitoring of patients participating in clinical trials of carotid artery therapy requires noninvasive precision methods that are inexpensive, safe and widely available. Noninvasive ultrasonic duplex Doppler velocimetry provides a precision method that can be used for recruitment qualification, pre-treatment classification and post treatment surveillance for remodeling and restenosis. The University of Washington Ultrasound Reading Center (UWURC) provides a uniform examination protocol and interpretation of duplex Doppler velocity measurements.
METHODS: Doppler waveforms from 6 locations along the common carotid and internal carotid artery path to the brain plus the external carotid and vertebral arteries on each side using a Doppler examination angle of 60 degrees are evaluated. The UWURC verifies all measurements against the images and waveforms for the database, which includes pre-procedure, post-procedure and annual follow-up examinations. Doppler angle alignment errors greater than 3 degrees and Doppler velocity measurement errors greater than 0.05 m/s are corrected.
RESULTS: Angle adjusted Doppler velocity measurements produce higher values when higher Doppler examination angles are used. The definition of peak systolic velocity varies between examiners when spectral broadening due to turbulence is present. Examples of measurements are shown. DISCUSSION: Although ultrasonic duplex Doppler methods are widely used in carotid artery diagnosis, there is disagreement about how the examinations should be performed and how the results should be validated. In clinical trails, a centralized reading center can unify the methods. Because the goals of research examinations are different from those of clinical examinations, screening and diagnostic clinical examinations may require fewer velocity measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822530      PMCID: PMC2944149          DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-8-39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound        ISSN: 1476-7120            Impact factor:   2.062


  28 in total

1.  Classification of ophthalmic artery flow in patients with occlusive carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Sayuri Fujioka; Kaoruko Karashima; Hidemitsu Nakagawa; Yoshihiro Saito; Norikiyo Nishikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Assessment of flow changes in the circle of Willis after stenting for severe internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Anna Kablak-Ziembicka; Tadeusz Przewlocki; Piotr Pieniazek; Piotr Musialek; Rafal Motyl; Zbigniew Moczulski; Wieslawa Tracz
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.487

3.  Sources of variability in carotid duplex examination: a prospective study.

Authors:  T Kohler; Y Langlois; G O Roederer; D J Phillips; K W Beach; J Primozich; R Lawrence; S C Nicholls; D E Strandness
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning.

Authors:  G L Moneta; J M Edwards; R W Chitwood; L M Taylor; R W Lee; C A Cummings; J M Porter
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  Carotid artery duplex scanning.

Authors:  D C Taylor; D E Strandness
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.910

6.  Effect of contralateral severe stenosis or carotid occlusion on duplex criteria of ipsilateral stenoses: comparative study of various duplex parameters.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; B K Richmond; P A Robinson; S Khan; J A Pollack; S Alberts
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  The effect of contralateral disease on carotid Doppler frequency.

Authors:  A C Hayes; K W Johnston; W H Baker; C Kupper; M A Poole; B Keagy; S Burnham
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Some variations of the circle of Willis, important for cerebral protection in aortic surgery--a study in Eastern Europeans.

Authors:  Vassil Papantchev; Stanislav Hristov; Daniela Todorova; Emanuil Naydenov; Adrian Paloff; Dimitar Nikolov; Alexander Tschirkov; Wladimir Ovtscharoff
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis: is stratification according to risk factors or duplex spectral analysis possible?

Authors:  G L Moneta; D C Taylor; R E Zierler; A Kazmers; K Beach; D E Strandness
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis.

Authors:  G L Moneta; J M Edwards; G Papanicolaou; T Hatsukami; L M Taylor; D E Strandness; J M Porter
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Simulation for competency assessment in vascular and cardiac ultrasound.

Authors:  Florence H Sheehan; R Eugene Zierler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  Evaluation of Examiner Performance Using a Duplex Ultrasound Simulator. Flow Velocity Measurements in Dialysis Access Fistula Models.

Authors:  Daniel F Leotta; R Eugene Zierler; Kurt Sansom; Alberto Aliseda; Mark D Anderson; Florence H Sheehan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Vascular imaging in stroke: comparative analysis.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Volumetric blood flow measurement using Doppler ultrasound: concerns about the technique.

Authors:  Pablo Blanco
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 5.  Searching the perfect ultrasonic classification in assessing carotid artery stenosis: comparison and remarks upon the existing ultrasound criteria.

Authors:  Chiara Mozzini; Giuseppe Roscia; Alder Casadei; Luciano Cominacini
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  Agreement between site-reported and ultrasound core laboratory results for duplex ultrasound velocity measurements in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial.

Authors:  R Eugene Zierler; Kirk W Beach; Robert O Bergelin; Brajesh K Lal; Wesley S Moore; Gary S Roubin; Jenifer H Voeks; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  The use of structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound ensures time-efficiency and report quality during residency.

Authors:  Benjamin P Ernst; Sebastian Strieth; Fabian Katzer; Mohamed Hodeib; Jonas Eckrich; Katharina Bahr; Tobias Rader; Julian Künzel; Matthias F Froelich; Christoph Matthias; Wieland H Sommer; Sven Becker
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Multi-parametric ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery disease-comparison with CT angiography.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Thomas Floegel; Hagen H Kitzler; Jessica Kepplinger; Timo Siepmann; Lars-Peder Pallesen; Ulf Bodechtel; Heinz Reichmann; Andrei V Alexandrov; Volker Puetz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Sensitivity evaluation of DSA-based parametric imaging using Doppler ultrasound in neurovascular phantoms.

Authors:  A Balasubramoniam; D R Bednarek; S Rudin; C N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-29

10.  Development of a Duplex Ultrasound Simulator and Preliminary Validation of Velocity Measurements in Carotid Artery Models.

Authors:  R Eugene Zierler; Daniel F Leotta; Kurt Sansom; Alberto Aliseda; Mark D Anderson; Florence H Sheehan
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 1.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.