Literature DB >> 7776480

Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis.

G L Moneta1, J M Edwards, G Papanicolaou, T Hatsukami, L M Taylor, D E Strandness, J M Porter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) showed that carotid endarterectomy reduces stroke risk in symptom-free patients with 60% or greater internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. This will surely lead to the performance of an increased number of screening duplex examinations. Assuming that positive study results will lead to arteriography or endarterectomy and keeping in mind the modest benefit for prophylactic endarterectomy demonstrated by ACAS (absolute risk reduction for ipsilateral stroke of 5.8% at 5 years), duplex criteria for 60% or greater ICA stenosis must have high positive predictive values (PPV). Determining criteria for 60% or greater stenosis, which emphasized high accuracy and PPV, forms the basis for this study.
METHODS: Stenoses detected by angiography in 352 ICAs were blindly compared with those detected by duplex scanning. Duplex criteria were determined for highest overall accuracy in detection of 60% or greater ICA stenosis and for 95% or greater PPV.
RESULTS: Maximal accuracy for detection of 60% or greater stenosis was 90%. This was achieved by the combination of a peak systolic velocity of 260 cm/sec or greater and an end diastolic velocity of 70 cm/sec or greater (sensitivity 84%, specificity 94%, PPV 92%). The 95% PPV for 60% or greater stenosis results from combining peak systolic velocity of 290 cm/sec or greater and end diastolic velocity of 80 cm/sec or greater.
CONCLUSIONS: With use of these criteria duplex scanning accurately detects with high PPVs the threshold level of ICA stenosis defined in ACAS as receiving stroke reduction benefit from prophylactic carotid endarterectomy. These criteria should be useful for carotid artery screening and minimizing unneeded intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7776480     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70228-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  Significance of sonographic tissue and surface characteristics of carotid plaques.

Authors:  T J Tegos; K J Kalomiris; M M Sabetai; E Kalodiki; A N Nicolaides
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [Significance of Doppler ultrasound procedures for diagnosis of carotid stenoses].

Authors:  R Kubale; C Arning
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Sonographic NASCET index: a new doppler parameter for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Gasser M Hathout; James R Fink; Suzie M El-Saden; Edward G Grant
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Bjoern D Suckow; Claire L Griffin; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney; Timothy G Lukovits; Robert M Zwolak; Mark F Fillinger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Investigating individual subjects and screening populations for asymptomatic carotid stenosis can be harmful.

Authors:  C J Whitty; C L Sudlow; C P Warlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Echomorphologic and histopathologic characteristics of unstable carotid plaques.

Authors:  T J Tegos; M Sohail; M M Sabetai; P Robless; N Akbar; G Pare; G Stansby; A N Nicolaides
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Combined use of color duplex ultrasonography and B-flow imaging for evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Muharrem Tola; Mehmet Yurdakul; Turhan Cumhur
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Standardized ultrasound evaluation of carotid stenosis for clinical trials: University of Washington Ultrasound Reading Center.

Authors:  Kirk W Beach; Robert O Bergelin; Daniel F Leotta; Jean F Primozich; P Max Sevareid; Edward T Stutzman; R Eugene Zierler
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  Poor agreement in carotid artery stenosis detection by ultrasound between external offices and a vascular center.

Authors:  Georgiana-Aura Giurgea; Ilda Lilaj; Michael E Gschwandtner; Christian Margeta; Sonja Zehetmayer; Christoph Domenig; Oliver Schlager; Michael Schwameis; Renate Koppensteiner; Andrea Willfort-Ehringer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Abnormal orthostatic blood pressure control among subjects with lacunar infarction.

Authors:  Daniel J Ryan; Rose Anne Kenny; Ciaran Finucane; James F Meaney; Daniel R Collins; Suzanne Walsh; Joseph A Harbison
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2016-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.