Literature DB >> 20822456

Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts: association with maternal satisfaction, team care, and treatment outcomes.

James M Robbins1, Peter Damiano, Charlotte M Druschel, Charlotte A Hobbs, Paul A Romitti, April A Austin, Margaret Tyler, J Alex Reading, Whitney Burnett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal diagnosis of an orofacial cleft is thought to allow mothers greater opportunity to become prepared for the special needs of an infant with a cleft and plan for the care of their child. Using a population-based sample, we determined which children were more likely to be diagnosed prenatally, and whether early diagnosis was associated with maternal satisfaction and treatment outcomes.
DESIGN: Interviews were completed with 235 (49% of eligible) mothers of children ages 2 to 7 with orofacial clefts initially enrolled in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study from the Arkansas, Iowa, and New York sites. Maternal satisfaction with information, support, and treatment outcomes was compared between women who received a prenatal diagnosis and those who did not.
RESULTS: Of 235 infants with clefts, 46 (19.6%) were identified prenatally. One third of mothers were somewhat or not satisfied with information provided by medical staff. Satisfaction did not vary by timing of the diagnosis. Infants diagnosed prenatally were no more likely to have received care provided by a recognized multidisciplinary cleft team (76%) than were infants diagnosed at birth (78%). Speech problems and facial appearance as rated by the mother did not vary by timing of the diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Timing of the cleft diagnosis did not alter maternal satisfaction with information, whether care was provided by a designated cleft team, or maternal perception of facial appearance or speech. Further research should determine whether prenatal diagnoses alter maternal anxiety or influence postnatal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822456      PMCID: PMC6034626          DOI: 10.1597/08-177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  14 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  D Shaikh; N S Mercer; K Sohan; P Kyle; P Soothill
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2001-06

2.  The impact of antenatal diagnosis on the effectiveness and timing of counselling for cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  A Davalbhakta; P N Hall
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2000-06

3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of pregnancy-related health care among Medicaid pregnant women.

Authors:  Norma I Gavin; E Kathleen Adams; Katherine E Hartmann; M Beth Benedict; Monique Chireau
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2004-09

4.  Prenatal counseling for cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  M S Matthews; M Cohen; M Viglione; A S Brown
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate: detection rates, accuracy of ultrasonography, associated anomalies, and strategies for counseling.

Authors:  Marilyn C Jones
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2002-03

6.  Physicians and the communication of "bad news": parent experiences of being informed of their child's cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  R P Strauss; M C Sharp; S C Lorch; B Kachalia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Prenatal diagnosis of craniofacial malformations with ultrasonography.

Authors:  G Pilu; E A Reece; R Romero; L Bovicelli; J C Hobbins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Sensitivity and accuracy of routine antenatal ultrasound screening for isolated facial clefts.

Authors:  C Wayne; K Cook; S Sairam; B Hollis; B Thilaganathan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Parental evaluation of informing interviews for cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  Abigail L Byrnes; Nancy W Berk; Margaret E Cooper; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Two- and three-dimensional sonographic assessment of the fetal face. 1. A systematic analysis of the normal face.

Authors:  D Rotten; J M Levaillant
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  5 in total

1.  Factors associated with high hospital resource use in a population-based study of children with orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Hilda Razzaghi; April Dawson; Scott D Grosse; Alexander C Allori; Russell S Kirby; Richard S Olney; Jane Correia; Cynthia H Cassell
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-02

2.  Oral clefts and behavioral health of young children.

Authors:  G L Wehby; M C Tyler; S Lindgren; P Romitti; J Robbins; P Damiano
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.511

3.  Psychosocial and socioeconomically aspects of mothers having a child with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P): a pilot-study during the first year of life.

Authors:  Konstanze Scheller; Jasmin Urich; Christian Scheller; Stephan Watzke
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Attitudes of pregnant women and mothers of children with orofacial clefts toward prenatal diagnosis of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts in a semiurban set-up in India.

Authors:  Poornima Kadagad; Pascal Pinto; Rajesh Powar
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-09

5.  Management of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Cleft Patients With and Without Multidisciplinary Team Care.

Authors:  Vanessa Torrecillas; Sarah Hatch Pollard; Hilary McCrary; Helene M Taylor; Alexandra Palmer; Jeremy Meier; Harlan Muntz; Jonathan R Skirko
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-10-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.