Literature DB >> 15027008

Two- and three-dimensional sonographic assessment of the fetal face. 1. A systematic analysis of the normal face.

D Rotten1, J M Levaillant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To detail fetal facial examination in utero using ultrasound, to distinguish between requirements for routine screening and those for precise analysis of fetal facial features, and to assess the use of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging in fetal facial examination.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study, based on the examination of approximately 10,500 fetuses. The usual age at screening ultrasound examination was 22 +/- 1 gestational weeks.
RESULTS: The sonographic anatomy of the normal fetal face was depicted, and the relevance of the three reference scanning planes, sagittal, coronal and axial, was specified.
CONCLUSIONS: At routine screening using two-dimensional sonography, at least two selected views must be imaged: the mid-sagittal plane (search for facial dysmorphology) and the anterior 'nose-mouth' coronal plane (search for disruption in lip continuity or deformation of the narinal bend). Precise analysis of fetal facial anomalies requires visualization and thorough step-by-step analysis in the three planes. The difference between routine screening and precise facial features' analysis has been greatly decreased since 3D and 4D sonography have become readily available. Using this modality, after surface analysis of the fetal face, the three reference planes are simultaneously imaged, using the multiplanar modality, and detailed. 3D/4D ultrasound imaging allows easier, more rapid screening and more precise evaluation of the different facial features. Copyright 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15027008     DOI: 10.1002/uog.984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  8 in total

Review 1.  Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help?

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Wesley Lee; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Fetal MRI as a complement to US in the evaluation of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  L Manganaro; A Tomei; F Fierro; M Di Maurizio; P Sollazzo; M E Sergi; V Vinci; S Bernardo; D Irimia; P Cascone; M Marini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts: association with maternal satisfaction, team care, and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  James M Robbins; Peter Damiano; Charlotte M Druschel; Charlotte A Hobbs; Paul A Romitti; April A Austin; Margaret Tyler; J Alex Reading; Whitney Burnett
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-09

4.  The role of prenatal ultrasound assessment in management of fetal cervicofacial tumors.

Authors:  Rafał Zieliński; Maria Respondek-Liberska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  Reference ranges for foetal nasal bone length, prenasal thickness, and interocular distance at 18 to 24 weeks' gestation in low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Ayşegül Altunkeser; M Kazım Körez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The differential diagnosis of fetal facial tumors: A case report of a neonatal granular cell tumor (GCT).

Authors:  Ammar Al Naimi; Stephan Spahn; Franz Bahlmann
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2019-05-03

7.  Prenatal ultrasound findings of ectodermal dysplasia: a case report.

Authors:  Liang Li; Yi Zhou; Ruixia Tian; Chaoxue Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Prenatal ultrasonography of craniofacial abnormalities.

Authors:  Annisa Shui Lam Mak; Kwok Yin Leung
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-07-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.