Literature DB >> 20821143

Dose verifications by use of liquid ionization chamber of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).

Kunihiko Tateoka1, Atsushi Oouchi, Kensei Nakata, Masato Hareyama.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the ability of an L-EPID to verify rectangular and irregular fields and to measure the transmitted exit doses. With respect to the beam profile of rectangular and irregular fields and the doses transmitted through an inhomogeneous phantom, the L-EPID dose obtained from the L-EPID measurement was compared with the conventional dose measured by use of a 0.12-cc ionization chamber and a 3D water phantom. In the comparison of the rectangular and irregular fields, the difference in the off-center ratio (OCR) between the L-EPID dose and the conventional dose was approximately 3% in the steep-dose-gradient region (penumbra regions, >30%/cm) and approximately +/-0.5% in the gentle-dose-gradient region (5%/cm). On the other hand, the dose differences between the L-EPID and the measured doses were less than approximately 2% in the gentle-dose-gradient region. In addition, in the steep-dose-gradient region, the maximum difference was 30%. However, the differences in the distance-to-agreement (DTA) were less than approximately +/-1 mm and were unrelated to the dose gradient. These results suggest that dose verification by L-EPID is very useful in clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20821143     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-008-0024-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  19 in total

Review 1.  In vivo dosimetry for tangential breast irradiation: role of the equipment in the accuracy of dose delivery.

Authors:  G Leunens; J Verstraete; J van Dam; A Dutreix; E van der Schueren
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Systematic verification of a three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm.

Authors:  A Cheng; W B Harms; R L Gerber; J W Wong; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  An electronic portal imaging device as a physics tool.

Authors:  A Curtin-Savard; E B Podgorsak
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.482

4.  Dosimetric characteristics of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  M Essers; B R Hoogervorst; M van Herk; H Lanson; B J Mijnheer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Portal dosimetry using a liquid ion chamber matrix: dose response studies.

Authors:  Y Zhu; X Q Jiang; J Van Dyk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Transmission dosimetry with a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  M Essers; R Boellaard; M van Herk; H Lanson; B Mijnheer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Input/output characteristics of a matrix ion-chamber electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  F F Yin; M C Schell; P Rubin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Exit dose measurements by portal film dosimetry.

Authors:  C Fiorino; A del Vecchio; G M Cattaneo; M Fusca; B Longobardi; P Signorotto; R Calandrino
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  First clinical experience with a newly developed electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  H Meertens; M van Herk; J Bijhold; H Bartelink
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Are port films reliable for in vivo exit dose measurements?

Authors:  J Van Dam; C Vaerman; N Blanckaert; G Leunens; A Dutreix; E van der Schueren
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.