UNLABELLED: Non-invasive coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to characterize the composition of non-calcified coronary plaques. CT-density values characterized by Hounsfield Units (HU) may classify non-calcified plaques as fibrous or lipid-rich, but the luminal density caused by the applied contrast material influences HU in the plaques in vitro. The influence of luminal density on HU in non-calcified plaques in vivo is unknown. Hence the purpose of this study was to test whether plaque characterization by CCTA in vivo depends on luminal density. Two CCTA-scans using two different contrast protocols were obtained from 14 male patients with coronary artery disease. The two contrast protocols applied resulted in high and low luminal density. Eleven non- calcified and 13 calcified plaques were identified and confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. Luminal attenuation differed with the two contrast protocols; 326[284;367] vs. 118[103;134] HU (P < 0.00001). In non-calcified plaques mean HU-values was lower 48[28;69] vs. 11[-4;25] HU (P = 0.004) with the low density protocol. As a consequence three out of eleven non-calcified plaques (27%) were reclassified from fibrous (high) to lipid rich (low). For calcified plaques a less pronounced but still significant difference in HU-values was found with the low luminal density. 770[622;919] vs. 675[496;855] HU (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Non-calcified plaques can be identified and classified by CCTA. However, the luminal density affects the absolute HU of both non-calcified and calcified plaques. Characterization and classification of non-calcified plaques by absolute CT values therefore requires standardization of contrast protocols.
UNLABELLED: Non-invasive coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to characterize the composition of non-calcified coronary plaques. CT-density values characterized by Hounsfield Units (HU) may classify non-calcified plaques as fibrous or lipid-rich, but the luminal density caused by the applied contrast material influences HU in the plaques in vitro. The influence of luminal density on HU in non-calcified plaques in vivo is unknown. Hence the purpose of this study was to test whether plaque characterization by CCTA in vivo depends on luminal density. Two CCTA-scans using two different contrast protocols were obtained from 14 male patients with coronary artery disease. The two contrast protocols applied resulted in high and low luminal density. Eleven non- calcified and 13 calcified plaques were identified and confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. Luminal attenuation differed with the two contrast protocols; 326[284;367] vs. 118[103;134] HU (P < 0.00001). In non-calcified plaques mean HU-values was lower 48[28;69] vs. 11[-4;25] HU (P = 0.004) with the low density protocol. As a consequence three out of eleven non-calcified plaques (27%) were reclassified from fibrous (high) to lipid rich (low). For calcified plaques a less pronounced but still significant difference in HU-values was found with the low luminal density. 770[622;919] vs. 675[496;855] HU (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Non-calcified plaques can be identified and classified by CCTA. However, the luminal density affects the absolute HU of both non-calcified and calcified plaques. Characterization and classification of non-calcified plaques by absolute CT values therefore requires standardization of contrast protocols.
Authors: S Schroeder; T Flohr; A F Kopp; C Meisner; A Kuettner; C Herdeg; A Baumbach; B Ohnesorge Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Anuja Nair; Barry D Kuban; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; Steven E Nissen; D Geoffrey Vince Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas T de Weert; Mohamed Ouhlous; Pieter E Zondervan; Johanna M Hendriks; Diederik W J Dippel; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Aad van der Lugt Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-04-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sandra S Halliburton; Paul Schoenhagen; Anuja Nair; Arthur Stillman; Michael Lieber; E Murat Tuzcu; D Geoffrey Vince; Richard D White Journal: Coron Artery Dis Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 1.439
Authors: Konstantin Nikolaou; Christoph R Becker; Michael Muders; Gregor Babaryka; Juergen Scheidler; Thomas Flohr; Udo Loehrs; Maximilian F Reiser; Zahi A Fayad Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Christoph R Becker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Michael Muders; Gregor Babaryka; Alexander Crispin; U Joseph Schoepf; Udo Loehrs; Maximilian F Reiser Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-04-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Wehab Ahmed; Michiel A de Graaf; Alexander Broersen; Pieter H Kitslaar; Elco Oost; Jouke Dijkstra; Jeroen J Bax; Johan H C Reiber; Arthur J Scholte Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Rolf Symons; Justin Z Morris; Colin O Wu; Amir Pourmorteza; Mark A Ahlman; João A C Lima; Marcus Y Chen; Marissa Mallek; Veit Sandfort; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Susan S Ellenberg; Cora E Lewis; Emile R Mohler; Nanette K Wenger; Shalender Bhasin; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Ronald S Swerdloff; Alisa Stephens-Shields; Jane A Cauley; Jill P Crandall; Glenn R Cunningham; Kristine E Ensrud; Thomas M Gill; Alvin M Matsumoto; Mark E Molitch; Rine Nakanishi; Negin Nezarat; Suguru Matsumoto; Xiaoling Hou; Shehzad Basaria; Susan J Diem; Christina Wang; Denise Cifelli; Peter J Snyder Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michiel A de Graaf; Alexander Broersen; Pieter H Kitslaar; Cornelis J Roos; Jouke Dijkstra; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; J Wouter Jukema; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax; Johan H C Reiber; Arthur J Scholte Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-02-16 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Yang Chen; Bin Lu; Zhi-hui Hou; Yang Gao; Fang-fang Yu; Wei-hua Yin; Zhi-qiang Wang Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-05-17 Impact factor: 2.357