CONTEXT: A variety of nursing home quality improvement programs have been implemented during the last decade but their implications for racial disparities on quality are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the longitudinal trend of racial disparities in pressure ulcer prevalence among high-risk, long-term nursing home residents and to assess whether persistent disparities are related to where residents received care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study of pressure ulcer rates in 2.1 million white and 346,808 black residents of 12,473 certified nursing homes in the United States that used the nursing home resident assessment; Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting files; and Area Resource Files for 2003 through 2008. Nursing homes were categorized according to their proportions of black residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk-adjusted racial disparities between and within sites of care and risk-adjusted odds of pressure ulcers in stages 2 through 4 for black and white residents receiving care in different nursing home facilities. RESULTS: Pressure ulcer rates decreased overall from 2003 through 2008 but black residents of nursing homes showed persistently higher pressure ulcer rates than white residents. In 2003, the pressure ulcer rate was 16.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6%-17.0%) for black nursing home residents compared with 11.4% (95% CI, 11.3%-11.5%) for white residents; in 2008, the rate was 14.6% (95% CI, 14.4%-14.8%) compared with 9.6% (95% CI, 9.5%-9.7%), respectively (P >.05 for trend of disparities). In nursing homes with the highest percentages of black residents (≥35%), both black residents (unadjusted rate of 15.5% [95% CI, 15.2%-15.8%] in 2008; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 1.52-1.67]) and white residents (unadjusted rate of 12.1% [95% CI, 11.8%-12.4%]; AOR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.26-1.40]) had higher rates of pressure ulcers than nursing homes serving primarily white residents (concentration of black residents <5%), in which white residents had an unadjusted rate of 8.8% (95% CI, 8.7%-8.9%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2003 through 2008, the prevalence of pressure ulcers among high-risk nursing home residents was higher among black residents than among white residents. This disparity was in part related to the site of nursing home care.
CONTEXT: A variety of nursing home quality improvement programs have been implemented during the last decade but their implications for racial disparities on quality are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the longitudinal trend of racial disparities in pressure ulcer prevalence among high-risk, long-term nursing home residents and to assess whether persistent disparities are related to where residents received care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study of pressure ulcer rates in 2.1 million white and 346,808 black residents of 12,473 certified nursing homes in the United States that used the nursing home resident assessment; Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting files; and Area Resource Files for 2003 through 2008. Nursing homes were categorized according to their proportions of black residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk-adjusted racial disparities between and within sites of care and risk-adjusted odds of pressure ulcers in stages 2 through 4 for black and white residents receiving care in different nursing home facilities. RESULTS: Pressure ulcer rates decreased overall from 2003 through 2008 but black residents of nursing homes showed persistently higher pressure ulcer rates than white residents. In 2003, the pressure ulcer rate was 16.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6%-17.0%) for black nursing home residents compared with 11.4% (95% CI, 11.3%-11.5%) for white residents; in 2008, the rate was 14.6% (95% CI, 14.4%-14.8%) compared with 9.6% (95% CI, 9.5%-9.7%), respectively (P >.05 for trend of disparities). In nursing homes with the highest percentages of black residents (≥35%), both black residents (unadjusted rate of 15.5% [95% CI, 15.2%-15.8%] in 2008; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 1.52-1.67]) and white residents (unadjusted rate of 12.1% [95% CI, 11.8%-12.4%]; AOR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.26-1.40]) had higher rates of pressure ulcers than nursing homes serving primarily white residents (concentration of black residents <5%), in which white residents had an unadjusted rate of 8.8% (95% CI, 8.7%-8.9%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2003 through 2008, the prevalence of pressure ulcers among high-risk nursing home residents was higher among black residents than among white residents. This disparity was in part related to the site of nursing home care.
Authors: D R Berlowitz; G H Brandeis; J J Anderson; A S Ash; B Kader; J N Morris; M A Moskowitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Marilyn J Rantz; Amy Vogelsmeier; Pam Manion; De Minner; Betty Markway; Vicki Conn; Myra A Aud; David R Mehr Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2003-04
Authors: William Rollow; Terry R Lied; Paul McGann; James Poyer; Lawrence LaVoie; Robert T Kambic; Dale W Bratzler; Allen Ma; Edwin D Huff; Lawrence D Ramunno Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn; Lynn Huang; David L Weimer; Ann Dozier Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Lawrence P Casalino; Arthur Elster; Andy Eisenberg; Evelyn Lewis; John Montgomery; Diana Ramos Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: David Barton Smith; Zhanlian Feng; Mary L Fennell; Jacqueline S Zinn; Vincent Mor Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jules Rosen; Vikas Mittal; Howard Degenholtz; Nick Castle; Benoit H Mulsant; David Nace; Fred H Rubin Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.347
Authors: Rosa R Baier; David R Gifford; Courtney H Lyder; Marie W Schall; Diane L Funston-Dillon; Jennifer M Lewis; Diana L Ordin Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Eric M Cheng; Salomeh Keyhani; Susan Ofner; Linda S Williams; Paul L Hebert; Diana L Ordin; Dawn M Bravata Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christine W Hartmann; Michael Shwartz; Shibei Zhao; Jennifer A Palmer; Dan R Berlowitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Yue Li; Charlene Harrington; Helena Temkin-Greener; Kai You; Xueya Cai; Xi Cen; Dana B Mukamel Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Donna Z Bliss; Olga Gurvich; Kay Savik; Lynn E Eberly; Susan Harms; Christine Mueller; Jean F Wyman; Judith Garrard; Beth Virnig Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2014-09-25
Authors: Jeph Herrin; Kevin Kenward; Maulik S Joshi; Anne-Marie J Audet; Stephen J Hines Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Kirsten Corazzini; Eleanor McConnell; Wei Pan; Mark Toles; Rasheeda Hall; Melissa Batchelor-Murphy; Tracey L Yap; Amber L Anderson; Andrew Burd; Ruth A Anderson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Susan Harms; Donna Z Bliss; Judith Garrard; Kristen Cunanan; Kay Savik; Olga Gurvich; Christine Mueller; Jean F Wyman; Lynn Eberly; Beth Virnig Journal: J Gerontol Nurs Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 1.254
Authors: Lisa Gould; Peter Abadir; Harold Brem; Marissa Carter; Teresa Conner-Kerr; Jeff Davidson; Luisa DiPietro; Vincent Falanga; Caroline Fife; Sue Gardner; Elizabeth Grice; John Harmon; William R Hazzard; Kevin P High; Pamela Houghton; Nasreen Jacobson; Robert S Kirsner; Elizabeth J Kovacs; David Margolis; Frances McFarland Horne; May J Reed; Dennis H Sullivan; Stephen Thom; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Jeremy Walston; JoAnne Whitney; John Williams; Susan Zieman; Kenneth Schmader Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.617