Literature DB >> 20819139

Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures.

S Abi Nader1, R F de Souza, D Fortin, L De Koninck, O Fromentin, R F Albuquerque Junior.   

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of simulated mastication on the retention of two stud attachment systems for 2-implants overdentures. Sixteen specimens, each simulating an edentulous ridge with implants and an overdenture were divided into two groups, according to the attachment system: Group I (Nobel Biocare ball-socket attachments) and Group II (Locator attachments). Retention forces were measured before and after 400,000 simulated masticatory loads in a customised device. Data were compared by two-way anova followed by Bonferroni test (α = 0·05). Group I presented significantly lower retention forces (Newtons) than Group II at baseline (10·6 ± 3·6 and 66·4 ± 16·0, respectively). However, differences were not significant after 400,000 loads (7·9 ± 4·3 and 21·6 ± 17·0). The number of cycles did not influence the measurements in Group I, whereas a non-linear descending curve was found for Group II. It was concluded that simulated mastication resulted in minor changes for the ball attachment tested. Nevertheless, it reduced the retention of Locator attachments to 40% of the baseline values, what suggests that mastication is a major factor associated with maintenance needs for this system.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819139     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  8 in total

1.  Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2013-02-06

Review 2.  Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

3.  The influence of saliva pH value on the retention and durability of bar-clip attachments.

Authors:  Antonio Sergio Silva; Carlos Aroso; Raul Ustrell; Ana Cristina Braga; Jose Manuel Mendes; Tomas Escuin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  In vitro retention force measurement for three different attachment systems for implant-retained overdenture.

Authors:  Kareem Mohammed Reda; Ibrahim Ramadan El-Torky; Mohamed Nabeel El-Gendy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

5.  Clinical evaluation of inter-implant distance influence on the wear characteristics of low-profile stud attachments used in mandibular implant‑retained overdentures.

Authors:  Nesreen El Mekawy; Mohamed-Yosry Elhawary
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-01-01

Review 6.  Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Raphaël Wakam; Aurélie Benoit; Kwamivi Bernardin Mawussi; Caroline Gorin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures.

Authors:  Atitiya Chindarungruangrat; Trinuch Eiampongpaiboon; Bundhit Jirajariyavej
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 4.927

8.  Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1-8 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Christophe Guédat; Ursina Nagy; Martin Schimmel; Frauke Müller; Murali Srinivasan
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2018-07-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.