Literature DB >> 20817572

Response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma during antiangiogenic therapy using arterial spin labeling and diffusion-weighted imaging: a feasibility study.

Michael Fenchel1, Marina Konaktchieva, Katja Weisel, Sabina Kraus, Claus D Claussen, Marius Horger.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether response to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with multiple myeloma can be assessed by noncontrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (ie, arterial-spin-labeling [ASL]), and diffusion-weighted [DWI] MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the local institutional ethic board. Ten consecutive patients (eight men, two women; mean age 60.5 ± 8.5 years) with Stage III multiple myeloma were prospectively included. MRI was performed at baseline, as well as 3 and 8 weeks after onset of antiangiogenic therapy. Functional MRI data were compared with clinical outcome and conventional lesion size and signal-intensity measurements. Differences between baseline and follow-up values for ASL-MRI and DWI-MRI were assessed using a paired Student t-test.
RESULTS: Nine patients responded well to therapy, whereas one patient was classified a nonresponder. Temporary changes in signal intensity between baseline and follow-up examinations were inconsistent on T1-weighted (w) and T2w images. Likewise, determination of lesion size at follow-up proved unreliable. ASL showed a marked decrease in perfusion from baseline (251 ± 159 mL/(min*100g)) to follow-up at 3 weeks (115 ± 85 mL/(min*100g), P = .01) and 8 weeks (101 ± 90 mL/(min*100g, P = .01), respectively. Relative to the baseline examination, mean diffusion increased from 0.68 ± 0.19 × 10(-3) s/mm(2) at baseline to 0.94 ± 0.24 × 10(-3) s/mm(2) after 3 weeks (P = .04), and 0.96 ± 0.40 × 10(-3) s/mm(2) after 8 weeks (P = .049). Both methods were able to correctly classify 9/10 patients as responder or nonresponder.
CONCLUSION: ASL perfusion as well as DWI-MRI provide accurate, clinically relevant information regarding tumor viability and can predict response already early after therapy onset, as opposed to classical lesion size and MRI signal-intensity measurements.
Copyright © 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20817572     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of multiple myeloma: Current concepts.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bannas
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 2.  Molecular imaging in myeloma precursor disease.

Authors:  Esther Mena; Peter Choyke; Esther Tan; Ola Landgren; Karen Kurdziel
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.851

3.  Application of diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI for response monitoring in multiple myeloma after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kaiwen Wang; Elsa Lee; Shedrack Kenis; Simon Hallam; Athar Haroon; Simon Wan; Neil Rabin; Antonio Rojas-Garcia; Anwar Padhani; Sola Adeleke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Monitoring the effects of bevacizumab beyond progression in a murine colorectal cancer model: a functional imaging approach.

Authors:  L Heijmen; C J A Punt; E G W Ter Voert; L F de Geus-Oei; A Heerschap; J Bussink; C G J Sweep; V Zerbi; W J G Oyen; P N Span; O Boerman; H W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.

Authors:  C J Galbán; B A Hoff; T L Chenevert; B D Ross
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  [Hemato-oncological imaging : Importance of hybrid procedures].

Authors:  M E Mayerhoefer; A Haug
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Immediate Target Hit Assessment of CD13-Targeted Tissue Factor tTF-NGR in Advanced Malignant Disease.

Authors:  Mirjam Gerwing; Tobias Krähling; Christoph Schliemann; Saliha Harrach; Christian Schwöppe; Andrew F Berdel; Sebastian Klein; Wolfgang Hartmann; Eva Wardelmann; Walter L Heindel; Georg Lenz; Wolfgang E Berdel; Moritz Wildgruber
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.