Literature DB >> 20815066

Flow-sensitive four-dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: a validation study.

Sarah Nordmeyer1, Eugénie Riesenkampff, Gérard Crelier, Alireza Khasheei, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Felix Berger, Titus Kuehne.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To further validate the quantitative use of flow-sensitive four-dimensional velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging (4D VEC MRI) for simultaneously acquired venous and arterial blood flow in healthy volunteers and for abnormal flow in patients with congenital heart disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stroke volumes (SV) obtained in arterial and venous thoracic vessels were compared between standard two-dimensional (2D), 4D VEC MRI with and without respiratory navigator gating (gated/nongated) in volunteers (n = 7). In addition, SV and regurgitation fractions (RF) measured in aorta or pulmonary trunk of patients with malformed and/or insufficient valves (n = 10) were compared between 2D and nongated 4D VEC MRI methods.
RESULTS: In volunteers and patients, Bland-Altman tests showed excellent agreement between 2D, gated, and nongated 4D VEC MRI obtained quantitative blood flow measurements. The bias between 2D and gated 4D VEC MRI was <0.5 mL for SV; between 2D and nongated 4D VEC MRI the bias was <0.7 mL for SV and <1% for RF.
CONCLUSION: Blood flow can be quantified accurately in arterial, venous, and pathological flow conditions using 4D VEC MRI. Nongated 4D VEC MRI has the potential to be suited for clinical use in patients with congenital heart disease who require flow acquisitions in multiple vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20815066     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  47 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro validation of aortic flow quantification by time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded MRI.

Authors:  Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Sasan Partovi; Philipp Geisbüsch; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Hemodynamic assessment in patients with one-and-a-half ventricle repair revealed by four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sergio Uribe; Pablo Bächler; Israel Valverde; Gérard R Crelier; Philipp Beerbaum; Cristian Tejos; Pablo Irarrazaval
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Pim van Ooij; Alex Powell; James Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Complex 3D blood flow pathways in two cases of aorta to right heart fistulae: a 4D flow MRI study.

Authors:  Darshit Thakrar; Andrada Popescu; Suraj Gupta; Andrew de Freitas; Hyde Russell; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  k-t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k-space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Alex J Barker; Ryan Scott Dolan; James C Carr; Pim van Ooij; Rouzbeh Ahmadian; Alex Powell; Jeremy D Collins; Julia Geiger; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  4-D MRI flow analysis in the course of interrupted aortic arch reveals complex morphology and quantifies amount of collateral blood flow.

Authors:  Daniel Hirtler; Julia Geiger; Bernd Jung; Michael Markl; Raoul Arnold
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-02-17

Review 8.  4D flow imaging: current status to future clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly Jarvis; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-12-09

10.  Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Michael J Rose; Kelly Jarvis; Varun Chowdhary; Alex J Barker; Bradley D Allen; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Susanne Schnell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.