Literature DB >> 20813727

Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function.

Jan Minners1, Martin Allgeier, Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf, Rolf-Peter Kienzle, Franz-Josef Neumann, Nikolaus Jander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On echocardiography approximately one-third of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis based on aortic valve area (AVA<1.0 cm(2)) demonstrate a non-severe mean pressure gradient (DeltaPm; < or =40 mm Hg) despite apparently normal left ventricular function. It has been suggested that inconsistent echocardiographic grading may be due to 'paradoxical' low stroke volume. However, the correct echocardiographic assessment of stroke volume hinges on the often problematic measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether inconsistent grading and reduced stroke volume persist when the quantification of aortic valve stenosis is based on cardiac catheterisation which is independent of LVOT measurements. METHODS AND
RESULTS: 333 consecutive patients underwent cardiac catheterisation within 30 days after their index echocardiography showing an AVA < or =2 cm(2) and shortening fraction > or =30%. On invasive testing 85 patients (26%) demonstrated inconsistent (AVA<1 cm(2) and DeltaPm< or =40 mm Hg) and 153 (46%) consistent grading (AVA<1 cm(2) and DeltaPm>40 mm Hg) with the remainder (28%) presenting with a calculated AVA> or =1 cm(2). Inconsistently graded patients were older (71 vs 67 years, p<0.006) with no differences in sex or body surface area between groups. Stroke volume and stroke volume index were significantly lower in inconsistently graded patients (63+/-14 vs 73+/-18 ml and 35+/-7 vs 39+/-7 ml/m(2), respectively, both p<0.001). However, 41/85 (48%) of inconsistently graded patients had a normal stroke volume index >35 ml/m(2).
CONCLUSION: In the framework of current guidelines inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis is common, extends to cardiac catheterisation and is only partially explained by low stroke volume despite apparently normal left ventricular systolic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813727     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.181982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  40 in total

1.  Grading aortic stenosis severity when the flow modifies the gradientvalve area correlation.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

2.  Low-flow aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Kou Seisyou
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-12-17

3.  Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow.

Authors:  Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Krishna Bandi; Julio Garcia; Mazen Albaghdadi; Patrick McCarthy; Robert O Bonow; James Carr; Jeremy Collins; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Chia-Shing Yang; Erik S Marshall; Zaher Fanari; Michael J Kostal; Joseph T West; Paul Kolm; William S Weintraub; Andrew J Doorey
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Praveen Mehrotra; Katrijn Jansen; Aidan W Flynn; Timothy C Tan; Sammy Elmariah; Michael H Picard; Judy Hung
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Natural progression of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Antony Leslie Innasimuthu; Sanjay Kumar; Jason Lazar; William E Katz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-06-01

7.  Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Romain Capoulade; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 8.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

9.  Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; Paul Sorajja; Hector I Michelena; Joseph F Malouf; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.