Literature DB >> 20810639

Determination of gross chromosomal rearrangement rates.

Christopher D Putnam1, Richard D Kolodner.   

Abstract

Cells devote a significant amount of metabolism to maintaining the stability of their genome and to preventing inappropriate chromosomal rearrangements that are characteristic of many cancers. A simple genetic assay using haploid derivatives of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a means to quantitatively measure the rate at which gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) accumulate in different genetic backgrounds. This assay measures the rate of simultaneous inactivation of CAN1 and URA3 markers placed on a nonessential end of a yeast chromosome and in principle can be implemented in any haploid strain. Rearrangements detected with this assay include broken chromosomes healed by de novo telomere additions and a spectrum of inter- and intrachromosomal fusion events. The GCR assay allows for detailed analysis of the contributions of individual genes and different pathways in the suppression of genomic instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810639      PMCID: PMC3047512          DOI: 10.1101/pdb.prot5492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc        ISSN: 1559-6095


  13 in total

1.  Telomere dysfunction increases mutation rate and genomic instability.

Authors:  J A Hackett; D M Feldser; C W Greider
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Stephanie Smith; Ji-Young Hwang; Soma Banerjee; Anju Majeed; Amitabha Gupta; Kyungjaem Myung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mutation in Rpa1 results in defective DNA double-strand break repair, chromosomal instability and cancer in mice.

Authors:  Yuxun Wang; Christopher D Putnam; Michael F Kane; Weijia Zhang; Lisa Edelmann; Robert Russell; Danaise V Carrión; Lynda Chin; Raju Kucherlapati; Richard D Kolodner; Winfried Edelmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-06-19       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Analysis of gross-chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kristina H Schmidt; Vincent Pennaneach; Christopher D Putnam; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K Myung; A Datta; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  Measuring the rate of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A practical approach to study genomic rearrangements observed in cancer.

Authors:  Akira Motegi; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants.

Authors:  C Chen; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Richard D Kolodner; Christopher D Putnam; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Specific pathways prevent duplication-mediated genome rearrangements.

Authors:  Christopher D Putnam; Tikvah K Hayes; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  27 in total

1.  Molecular Circuitry of the SUMO (Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier) Pathway in Controlling Sumoylation Homeostasis and Suppressing Genome Rearrangements.

Authors:  Claudio Ponte de Albuquerque; Jason Liang; Nathaniel James Gaut; Huilin Zhou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Molecular Basis for Control of Diverse Genome Stability Factors by the Multi-BRCT Scaffold Rtt107.

Authors:  Bingbing Wan; Jian Wu; Xiangzhou Meng; Ming Lei; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  A Slowed Cell Cycle Stabilizes the Budding Yeast Genome.

Authors:  Peter J Vinton; Ted Weinert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Phosphorylation of Sae2 Mediates Forkhead-associated (FHA) Domain-specific Interaction and Regulates Its DNA Repair Function.

Authors:  Jason Liang; Raymond T Suhandynata; Huilin Zhou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Mre11-Sae2 and RPA Collaborate to Prevent Palindromic Gene Amplification.

Authors:  Sarah K Deng; Yi Yin; Thomas D Petes; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Pif1 family helicases suppress genome instability at G-quadruplex motifs.

Authors:  Katrin Paeschke; Matthew L Bochman; P Daniela Garcia; Petr Cejka; Katherine L Friedman; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Diploid-specific [corrected] genome stability genes of S. cerevisiae: genomic screen reveals haploidization as an escape from persisting DNA rearrangement stress.

Authors:  Malgorzata Alabrudzinska; Marek Skoneczny; Adrianna Skoneczna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A genomic screen revealing the importance of vesicular trafficking pathways in genome maintenance and protection against genotoxic stress in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells.

Authors:  Kamil Krol; Izabela Brozda; Marek Skoneczny; Maria Bretner; Maria Bretne; Adrianna Skoneczna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Stimulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by the human CEB1 and CEB25 minisatellites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on G-quadruplexes or Cdc13.

Authors:  Aurèle Piazza; Alexandre Serero; Jean-Baptiste Boulé; Patricia Legoix-Né; Judith Lopes; Alain Nicolas
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A Chemical and Enzymatic Approach to Study Site-Specific Sumoylation.

Authors:  Claudio P Albuquerque; Eyan Yeung; Shawn Ma; Ting Fu; Kevin D Corbett; Huilin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.