Literature DB >> 20810091

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kazunori Yasuda1, Yoshie Tanabe, Eiji Kondo, Nobuto Kitamura, Harukazu Tohyama.   

Abstract

Several double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures were reported in the 1980s and 1990s. However, no significant differences were found in the clinical results between these double-bundle procedures and single-bundle procedures because the double-bundle procedures appeared to reconstruct only the anteromedial bundle with 2 bundles. In the early 2000s, we proposed a new concept of anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles, in which 4 independent tunnels were created through the center of each anatomic attachment of the 2 bundles. We called it "anatomic" double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction can restore knee stability significantly more closely to the normal level than the conventional single-bundle reconstruction. Recent intraoperative measurement studies have shown that the clinically available anatomic double-bundle procedures can reconstruct knee stability significantly better and improve knee function close to the normal level at the time immediately after surgery compared with the conventional single-bundle procedures. However, the greatest criticism of the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction is whether its clinical results are better than the results of single-bundle reconstruction. To date (January 2010), 10 prospective comparative clinical trials (Level I or II) and 1 meta-analysis have been reported comparing single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle reconstructions using hamstring tendons. In 8 of the 10 studies, the anterior and/or rotatory stability of the knee was significantly better with the anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction than with the conventional single-bundle reconstruction. However, 1 original trial and the meta-analysis found that there were no differences in the results between the 2 types of reconstructions. Thus the utility of the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction has not yet been established. Our review does show how much evidence exists as to the benefits of double-bundle ACL reconstruction at present.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810091     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  33 in total

1.  Analysis of tunnel widening after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Sheen-Woo Lee; Shin Woo Nam; Won Seok Oh; Jae Ang Sim; Ji Hoon Kwak; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Double-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  David Dejour; Paolo Ferrua; Nicolas Bonin; Paulo Renato Fernandes Saggin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices.

Authors:  Ofir Chechik; Eyal Amar; Morsi Khashan; Ran Lador; Gil Eyal; Aviram Gold
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Three-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging can provide a reliable estimate of the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site anatomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Araki; Eric Thorhauer; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Return of normal gait as an outcome measurement in acl reconstructed patients. A systematic review.

Authors:  A Gokeler; A Benjaminse; C F van Eck; K E Webster; L Schot; E Otten
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

6.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior crucial ligament reconstruction with G-ST.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuroda; Takehiko Matsushita
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-06

7.  Relationship between thickness of the anteromedial bundle and thickness of the posterolateral bundle in the normal ACL.

Authors:  Michihiro Katouda; Takashi Soejima; Tomonoshin Kanazawa; Kousuke Tabuchi; Kouichi Yamaki; Kensei Nagata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Evidence-Based ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 9.  Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Bart Muller; Marcus Hofbauer; Jidapa Wongcharoenwatana; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Rotational laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction measured by 3-D motion analysis: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic and nonanatomic ACL reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Marie Bagger Bohn; Henrik Sørensen; Mette Krintel Petersen; Kjeld Søballe; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.