Literature DB >> 20803347

Survival of commercial yeasts in the winery environment and their prevalence during spontaneous fermentations.

P Blanco1, I Orriols, A Losada.   

Abstract

Inoculation of active dry yeasts during the wine-making process has become a common practice in most wine-producing regions; this practice may affect the diversity of the indigenous population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the winery. The aim of this work was to study the incidence of commercial yeasts in the experimental winery of Estación de Viticultura e Enoloxía de Galicia (EVEGA) and their ability to lead spontaneous fermentations. To do this, 64 spontaneous fermentations were carried out in the experimental cellar of EVEGA over a period of 7 years. Samples were taken from must and at the beginning, vigorous and final stages of fermentation. A representative number of yeast colonies was isolated from each sample. S. cerevisiae strains were characterised by analysis of mitochondrial DNA restriction patterns. The results showed that although more than 40 different strains of S. cerevisiae were identified, only 10 were found as the dominant strain or in codominance with other strains in spontaneous fermentations. The genetic profiles (mtDNA-RFLPs) of eight of these strains were similar to those of different commercial yeasts that had been previously used in the EVEGA cellar. The remaining two strains were autochthonous ones that were able to reach implantation frequencies as high of those of commercial yeasts. These results clearly indicated that commercial wine yeasts were perfectly adapted to survive in EVEGA cellar conditions, and they successfully competed with the indigenous strains of S. cerevisiae, even during spontaneous fermentations. On the other hand, autochthonous dominant strains that presented desirable oenological traits could be of interest to preserve wine typicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20803347     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0818-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  11 in total

1.  Enological and genetic traits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from former and modern wineries.

Authors:  Luca Cocolin; Vincenzo Pepe; Francesca Comitini; Giuseppe Comi; Maurizio Ciani
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Dissemination and survival of commercial wine yeast in the vineyard: a large-scale, three-years study.

Authors:  Eva Valero; Dorit Schuller; Brigitte Cambon; Margarida Casal; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Molecular monitoring of wine fermentations conducted by active dry yeast strains.

Authors:  A Querol; E Barrio; T Huerta; D Ramón
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Analysis of yeast population during spontaneous alcoholic fermentation: effect of the age of the cellar and the practice of inoculation.

Authors:  Pilar Santamaría; Patrocinio Garijo; Rosa López; Carmen Tenorio; Ana Rosa Gutiérrez
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Genetic diversity of wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in an experimental winery from Galicia (NW Spain).

Authors:  P Blanco; A Ramilo; M Cerdeira; I Orriols
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Diversity of Saccharomyces strains on grapes and winery surfaces: analysis of their contribution to fermentative flora of Malbec wine from Mendoza (Argentina) during two consecutive years.

Authors:  L Mercado; A Dalcero; R Masuelli; M Combina
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 5.516

7.  Dynamics of indigenous and inoculated yeast populations and their effect on the sensory character of Riesling and Chardonnay wines.

Authors:  C M Egli; W D Edinger; C M Mitrakul; T Henick-Kling
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Analysis of yeast populations during alcoholic fermentation: a six year follow-up study.

Authors:  Gemma Beltran; Maria Jesús Torija; Maite Novo; Noemi Ferrer; Montserrat Poblet; José M Guillamón; Nicolas Rozès; Albert Mas
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.022

9.  Survival of inoculated Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain on wine grapes during two vintages.

Authors:  F Comitini; M Ciani
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.858

10.  Contribution of winery-resident Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to spontaneous grape must fermentation.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Ilaria Mannazzu; Paola Marinangeli; Francesca Clementi; Alessandro Martini
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.271

View more
  11 in total

1.  SaccharomycesIDentifier, SID: strain-level analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations by using microsatellite meta-patterns.

Authors:  Irene Stefanini; Davide Albanese; Maddalena Sordo; Jean-Luc Legras; Carlotta De Filippo; Duccio Cavalieri; Claudio Donati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Geographic delineations of yeast communities and populations associated with vines and wines in New Zealand.

Authors:  Velimir Gayevskiy; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Effect of sulfite addition and pied de cuve inoculation on the microbial communities and sensory profiles of Chardonnay wines: dominance of indigenous Saccharomyces uvarum at a commercial winery.

Authors:  Sydney C Morgan; Garrett C McCarthy; Brittany S Watters; Mansak Tantikachornkiat; Ieva Zigg; Margaret A Cliff; Daniel M Durall
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  An indigenous Saccharomyces uvarum population with high genetic diversity dominates uninoculated Chardonnay fermentations at a Canadian winery.

Authors:  Garrett C McCarthy; Sydney C Morgan; Jonathan T Martiniuk; Brianne L Newman; Stephanie E McCann; Vivien Measday; Daniel M Durall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mixing of vineyard and oak-tree ecotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in North American vineyards.

Authors:  Katie E Hyma; Justin C Fay
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The impact of active dry yeasts in commercial wineries from the Denomination of Origen "Vinos de Madrid", Spain.

Authors:  M Gil-Díaz; E Valero; J M Cabellos; M García; T Arroyo
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Brewhouse-resident microbiota are responsible for multi-stage fermentation of American coolship ale.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; Charles W Bamforth; David A Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of Commercial Strain Use on Saccharomyces cerevisiae Population Structure and Dynamics in Pinot Noir Vineyards and Spontaneous Fermentations of a Canadian Winery.

Authors:  Jonathan T Martiniuk; Braydon Pacheco; Gordon Russell; Stephanie Tong; Ian Backstrom; Vivien Measday
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The establishment of a fungal consortium in a new winery.

Authors:  Hany Abdo; Claudia Rita Catacchio; Mario Ventura; Pietro D'Addabbo; Hervé Alexandre; Michèle Guilloux-Bénatier; Sandrine Rousseaux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Monitoring Seasonal Changes in Winery-Resident Microbiota.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; Moe Ohta; Paul M Richardson; David A Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.