Literature DB >> 20802369

Bilateral cochlear implants in infants: a new approach--Nucleus Hybrid S12 project.

Bruce J Gantz1, Camille C Dunn, Elizabeth A Walker, Maura Kenworthy, Tanya Van Voorst, Bruce Tomblin, Chris Turner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate whether the use of a shorter-length cochlear implant (10 mm) on one ear and a standard electrode (24 mm) on the contralateral ear is a viable bilateral option for children with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine whether the ear with the shorter-length electrode performs similarly to the standard-length electrode. Our goal was to provide an option of electrical stimulation that theoretically might preserve the structures of the scala media and organ of Corti. STUDY
DESIGN: The study is being conducted as a repeated-measure, single-subject experiment.
SETTING: University of Iowa-Department of Otolaryngology. PATIENTS: Eight pediatric patients with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss between the ages of 12 and 24 months.
INTERVENTIONS: Nucleus Hybrid S12 10-mm electrode and a Nucleus Freedom implant in the contralateral ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) parent questionnaire, Early Speech Perception, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure word test, and Children's Vowel tests will be used to evaluate speech perception and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory and Preschool Language Scales 3 test will be used to evaluate language growth.
RESULTS: Preliminary results for 8 children have been collected before and after the operation using the IT-MAIS. All 3 children showed incremental improvements in their IT-MAIS scores overtime. Early Speech Perception, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure word test, and Children's Vowel word perception results indicated no difference between the individual ears for the 2 children tested. Performance compared with age-matched children implanted with standard bilateral cochlear implants showed similar results to the children implanted with Nucleus Hybrid S12 10-mm electrode and a Nucleus Freedom implant in contralateral ears.
CONCLUSION: The use of a shorter-length cochlear implant on one ear and a standard-length electrode on the contralateral ear might provide a viable option for bilateral cochlear implantation in children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss. Further study of this patient population will be continued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20802369      PMCID: PMC2951013          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f2eba1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  13 in total

1.  Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Richard S Tyler; Jay T Rubinstein; Abigail Wolaver; Mary Lowder; Paul Abbas; Carolyn Brown; Michelle Hughes; John P Preece
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and trans-differentiate into hair cells.

Authors:  Patricia M White; Angelika Doetzlhofer; Yun Shain Lee; Andrew K Groves; Neil Segil
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mansze Mok; Karyn L Galvin; Richard C Dowell; Colette M McKay
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Sarah Oakley; Bruce J Gantz; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Impact of hair cell preservation in cochlear implantation: combined electric and acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Sue Karsten; Jennifer Fowler; Lina A Reiss
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Bruce J Gantz; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Karyn Louise Galvin; Mansze Mok; Richard C Dowell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Sheryl R Erenberg; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Stephanie Gogel; Tanya Van Voorst; Marlan Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Audit of Bilateral Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Population: South Indian Study.

Authors:  Abha Kumari; Sunil Goyal; Neha Chauhan; Thirugnanam Sarankumar; Krushna Chaitanya; Mohan Kameswaran
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 4.  Cochlear implantation: a biomechanical prosthesis for hearing loss.

Authors:  Robert Yawn; Jacob B Hunter; Alex D Sweeney; Marc L Bennett
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 5.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Priscila Carvalho Miranda; André Luiz Lopes Sampaio; Rafaela Aquino Fernandes Lopes; Alessandra Ramos Venosa; Carlos Augusto Costa Pires de Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-03

6.  Electro acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: UNICAMP's surgical approach.

Authors:  Guilherme Machado de Carvalho; João Paulo Peral Valente; Alexandre Scalli Mathias Duarte; Eder Barbosa Muranaka; Alexandre Caixeta Guimarães; Marcelo Naoki Soki; Walter Adriano Bianchini; Arthur Menino Castilho; Jorge Rizzato Paschoal
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.