Literature DB >> 19468210

Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Mansze Mok1, Karyn L Galvin, Richard C Dowell, Colette M McKay.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study are to investigate: (1) the effect of using a hearing aid (HA) or a second cochlear implant (2nd CI) on speech recognition in noise for children; (2) the ability to perceive phoneme groups of different frequencies when using a CI and an HA in opposite ears (bimodal fitting) and when using a CI in each ear (bilateral implant fitting), and (3) the relationship between aided thresholds in the HA ear and bimodal advantage. Thirteen school-age children who consistently used a bimodal or bilateral implant fitting participated. Perception was evaluated using consonant-nucleus-consonantwords presented from in front with noise from either side. Significant bimodal or bilateral CI advantage in speech perception was demonstrated by most subjects in at least 1 noise condition. Comparisons indicated that the bimodal advantage obtained by the bimodal subjects was greater than the bilateral CI advantage obtained by the bilateral-implant subjects in the noise front condition, but also suggested that the 2nd CI may provide more functional advantage in real life. The mechanisms underlying the advantage provided by the second device appear to be different in the bimodal and bilateral groups. Information transmission analysis did not show a clear difference between the groups in the pattern of advantage across phoneme groups. For the bimodal subjects, those with better aided thresholds at low frequencies and poorer aided thresholds at 4 kHz demonstrated greater bimodal advantage. Overall, these findings encourage the use of bimodal and bilateral implant fittings for children, provide insight into the individual variability in bimodal outcome, and enhance understanding of the differences between an HA and a 2nd CI when used together with an implant in the opposite ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19468210     DOI: 10.1159/000219487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  39 in total

1.  Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Michelle Simha; Kelly N Jahn; René H Gifford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Stephanie Gogel; Tanya Van Voorst; Marlan Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Sound localization skills in children who use bilateral cochlear implants and in children with normal acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Eric Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein; Caitlin Rice; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Christina L Runge; Jamie Jensen; David R Friedland; Ruth Y Litovsky; Sergey Tarima
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Cochlear implantation in nontraditional candidates: preliminary results in adolescents with asymmetric hearing loss.

Authors:  Jamie H Cadieux; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.