Literature DB >> 20801278

Applications of response shift theory and methods to participation measurement: a brief history of a young field.

Carolyn E Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Measurement of participation in people with disability can pose psychometric and conceptual challenges. Ambiguous or paradoxical findings can occur because of differences among people or changes within people regarding internal standards, values, or conceptualization of participation. These response shifts can affect standard psychometric indices, such as reliability and validity. We focus herein on the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes and, in particular, on the cognitive appraisal processes known as response shift. We present theoretical and conceptual distinctions building on response shift theory and other current developments in health-related quality of life research to inform participation measurement research. We discuss how response shifts can influence the interpretation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of participation measures. We then discuss the evidence for the clinical significance of response shift phenomena and describe current design, statistical, and individualized approaches for detecting response shift phenomena. Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20801278     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  22 in total

1.  An Investigation of Occupational Therapists' and Physical Therapists' Perspectives on the Process of Change That Occurs among Clients during Rehabilitation, Including Their Use of Response Shift and Transformative Learning.

Authors:  Judy King; Ruth Barclay; Jacquie Ripat; Claire-Jehanne Dubouloz; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Potential factors associated with perceived cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jamie S Myers; Jo A Wick; Jennifer Klemp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Examining differential responses of youth with and without autism on a measure of everyday activity performance.

Authors:  Jessica M Kramer; Kendra Liljenquist; Pengsheng Ni; Wendy J Coster
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Mood states in long-term cancer survivors: an Italian descriptive survey.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta Annunziata; Barbara Muzzatti; Cristiana Flaiban; Lorena Giovannini; Matilde Carlucci
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Xingqiong Meng; Pip Youl; Joanne Aitken; Jeff Dunn; Peter Baade
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Ronak Brahmbatt; Lisa M Lix; Bruno D Zumbo; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Validity, reliability, and usability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test for autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Jessica M Kramer; Kendra Liljenquist; Wendy J Coster
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.449

8.  Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: a mixed methods investigation.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Bruce D Rapkin; Bruce A Rapkin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  An overview of children's oral health-related quality of life assessment: from scale development to measuring outcomes.

Authors:  M W Genderson; L Sischo; K Markowitz; D Fine; H L Broder
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  The importance of development standards for anchoring vignettes: an illustrative example from pediatric localized scleroderma quality of life.

Authors:  Christina K Zigler; Heidi Jacobe; Kaveh Ardalan; Theresa M Coles; Suzane Lane; Kaila L Schollaert; Kathryn S Torok
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.