Maria Antonietta Annunziata1, Barbara Muzzatti2, Cristiana Flaiban2, Lorena Giovannini2, Matilde Carlucci3. 1. Unit of Oncological Psychology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via F. Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy. annunziata@cro.it. 2. Unit of Oncological Psychology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via F. Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy. 3. Health Care Directorate, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Since long-term survivorship is now a reality for an increasing number of people with cancer, understanding their mood states (i.e., transient subjective emotional states) can inform health-care policy as well as help support individual patients. This study described the mood states of Italian long-term cancer survivors, compared them with normative data, and tested their association with the main clinical and socio-demographic sample's characteristics. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight Italian adults free from cancer and its treatments for at least 5 years were administered the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and two ad hoc 0-10-point visual-analogue scales on personal health-related worry and risk perception for a personal relapse, respectively. RESULTS: In comparison with the Italian normative sample, the current sample displayed a higher score in Vigor-Activity (p = 0.003) and a lower score in Confusion-Bewilderment (p = 0.008). In Tension-Anxiety, Confusion-Bewilderment, Depression-Dejection, Anger-Hostility, Fatigue-Inertia, and Vigor-Activity, 14.6, 15.9, 17.1, 17.8, 19.7, and 13.3 % of the sample, respectively, displayed meaningful scores (i.e., scores above or below 1 standard deviation from the normative mean score). The mood state profile POMS-provided was associated with gender (p = 0.002), occupational status (p = 0.003), reported health issues (p < 0.001), and quality of sleep (p < 0.001). In personal health-related worry and risk perception for a personal relapse, the average scores were 4.8 (SD = 3.0) and 4.1 (SD = 2.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data encourage a multidimensional assessment of emotional functioning of this specific population.
PURPOSE: Since long-term survivorship is now a reality for an increasing number of people with cancer, understanding their mood states (i.e., transient subjective emotional states) can inform health-care policy as well as help support individual patients. This study described the mood states of Italian long-term cancer survivors, compared them with normative data, and tested their association with the main clinical and socio-demographic sample's characteristics. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight Italian adults free from cancer and its treatments for at least 5 years were administered the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and two ad hoc 0-10-point visual-analogue scales on personal health-related worry and risk perception for a personal relapse, respectively. RESULTS: In comparison with the Italian normative sample, the current sample displayed a higher score in Vigor-Activity (p = 0.003) and a lower score in Confusion-Bewilderment (p = 0.008). In Tension-Anxiety, Confusion-Bewilderment, Depression-Dejection, Anger-Hostility, Fatigue-Inertia, and Vigor-Activity, 14.6, 15.9, 17.1, 17.8, 19.7, and 13.3 % of the sample, respectively, displayed meaningful scores (i.e., scores above or below 1 standard deviation from the normative mean score). The mood state profile POMS-provided was associated with gender (p = 0.002), occupational status (p = 0.003), reported health issues (p < 0.001), and quality of sleep (p < 0.001). In personal health-related worry and risk perception for a personal relapse, the average scores were 4.8 (SD = 3.0) and 4.1 (SD = 2.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data encourage a multidimensional assessment of emotional functioning of this specific population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer survivors; Mood states; Oncology; Personal health-related worry; Relapse risk perception
Authors: Barbara Muzzatti; Cristiana Flaiban; Antonella Surbone; Maria Antonietta Annunziata Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Anette Fischer Pedersen; Philip Rossen; Frede Olesen; Hans von der Maase; Peter Vedsted Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Floortje K Ploos van Amstel; Sanne W van den Berg; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Marieke F M Gielissen; Judith B Prins; Petronella B Ottevanger Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.603