Literature DB >> 26063170

Examining differential responses of youth with and without autism on a measure of everyday activity performance.

Jessica M Kramer1, Kendra Liljenquist2, Pengsheng Ni3, Wendy J Coster2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study further investigated items with differential item function (DIF) in the Social/Cognitive domain of a measure of everyday activity performance, the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adapted Test version for Autism "PEDI-CAT (ASD)," to understand possible sources of response variation in a heterogeneous sample of youth with autism compared to the national standardization sample.
METHODS: Cross-sectional design. A convenience sample of parents who identified they had a child between 3 and 21 years (M = 11.9 years, SD = 4.67 years) with autism (n = 365) completed an online survey that included the PEDI-CAT (ASD) and descriptive measures. For 28 items previously identified as having DIF, the PEDI-CAT (ASD) expected item score curves for the autism sample were compared to the original PEDI-CAT standardization sample. The weighted area between expected score curves (wABC) was also calculated; values >0.24 indicate significant DIF.
RESULTS: All items had wABC that exceeded the criterion. Compared with peers without disabilities at the same ability level, 11 items were significantly more difficult for the youth with autism and 16 items were significantly easier. One item demonstrated non-uniform DIF.
CONCLUSION: Differential responses could indicate that: (1) children with autism have a different developmental pattern of skill acquisition for everyday activities in the Social/Cognitive domain, or (2) parents of children with autism utilize a unique appraisal process when assessing their children's functional performance of everyday activities. Further research is required to better understand the factors leading to differential responses on the targeted items. The study illustrates the value of in-depth analysis of DIF to gain insight into the impact of a clinical condition on functional performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autistic disorder; Differential item function (DIF); Item response theory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063170      PMCID: PMC4619133          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1035-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  23 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of quality of life in children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: a critical review.

Authors:  Erika Ikeda; Erica Hinckson; Chris Krägeloh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Quantifying 'problematic' DIF within an IRT framework: application to a cancer stigma index.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Brian D Stucky; Anita Chandra
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Evaluating the appropriateness of a new computer-administered measure of adaptive function for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Wendy J Coster; Jessica M Kramer; Feng Tian; Meghan Dooley; Kendra Liljenquist; Ying-Chia Kao; Pengsheng Ni
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2015-01-28

4.  Improving measurement methods in rehabilitation: core concepts and recommendations for scale development.

Authors:  Craig A Velozo; Ronald T Seel; Susan Magasi; Allen W Heinemann; Sergio Romero
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Assessing measurement invariance of three depression scales between neurologic samples and community samples.

Authors:  Hyewon Chung; Jiseon Kim; Robert L Askew; Salene M W Jones; Karon F Cook; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations.

Authors:  J W Varni; M Seid; P S Kurtin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  An examination of the PROMIS(®) pediatric instruments to assess mobility in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Anna L Kratz; Mary D Slavin; M J Mulcahey; Alan M Jette; David S Tulsky; Stephen M Haley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Autism screening questionnaire: diagnostic validity.

Authors:  S K Berument; M Rutter; C Lord; A Pickles; A Bailey
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Strategies to address participant misrepresentation for eligibility in Web-based research.

Authors:  Jessica Kramer; Amy Rubin; Wendy Coster; Eric Helmuth; John Hermos; David Rosenbloom; Rich Moed; Meghan Dooley; Ying-Chia Kao; Kendra Liljenquist; Deborah Brief; Justin Enggasser; Terence Keane; Monica Roy; Mark Lachowicz
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 10.  Global prevalence of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders.

Authors:  Mayada Elsabbagh; Gauri Divan; Yun-Joo Koh; Young Shin Kim; Shuaib Kauchali; Carlos Marcín; Cecilia Montiel-Nava; Vikram Patel; Cristiane S Paula; Chongying Wang; Mohammad Taghi Yasamy; Eric Fombonne
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.216

View more
  2 in total

1.  Validity, reliability, and usability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test for autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Jessica M Kramer; Kendra Liljenquist; Wendy J Coster
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  Adaptive Skills in FXS: A Review of the Literature and Evaluation of the PEDI-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) to Measure Adaptive Skills.

Authors:  Lisa Cordeiro; Adrienne Villagomez; Deanna Swain; Sophia Deklotz; Nicole Tartaglia
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.