Literature DB >> 28090108

A Process for Curricular Improvement Based on Evaluation of Student Performance on Milestone Examinations.

Marcy Hernick1, Ann C Hylton1, Michael Justice1.   

Abstract

Objective. To identify and address areas for curricular improvement by evaluating student achievement of expected learning outcomes and competencies on annual milestone examinations. Design. Students were tested each professional year with a comprehensive milestone examination designed to evaluate student achievement of learning outcomes and professional competencies using a combination of multiple-choice questions, standardized patient assessments (SPAs), and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) questions. Assessment. Based on student performance on milestone examinations, curricular changes were instituted, including an increased emphasis on graded comprehensive cases, OSCE skills days, and use of patient simulation in lecture and laboratory courses. After making these changes, significant improvements were observed in second and third-year pharmacy students' grades for the therapeutic case and physician interaction/errors and omissions components of the milestone examinations. Conclusion. Results from milestone examinations can be used to identify specific areas in which curricular improvements are needed to foster student achievement of learning outcomes and professional competencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; curriculum; milestone examination; objective structured clinical examination (OSCE); progress examination; standardized patient assessments (SPA)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090108      PMCID: PMC5221841          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe809159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  9 in total

1.  A course assessment process for curricular quality improvement.

Authors:  Steven L Peterson; Kristina M Wittstrom; Mark J Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A model for curricular quality assessment and improvement.

Authors:  L Douglas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Development of a reliable, valid annual skills mastery assessment examination.

Authors:  Gregory L Alston; Bryan L Love
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Effect of incentives on student performance on Milemarker examinations.

Authors:  Sujit S Sansgiry; Surupa Chanda; Thomas Lemke; Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Curricular progress assessments: the MileMarker.

Authors:  Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Reliability of a minimal competency score for an annual skills mastery assessment.

Authors:  Gregory L Alston; Wesley R Haltom
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 7.  Progress examinations in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Assessment of streams of knowledge, skill, and attitude development across the doctor of pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Susan E Conway; Melissa S Medina; Nancy A Letassy; Mark L Britton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A Progressive, Collaborative Process to Improve a Curriculum and Define an Assessment Program.

Authors:  Nancy A Letassy; Melissa S Medina; Mark L Britton; Vince Dennis; JoLaine R Draugalis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.