Literature DB >> 20798250

The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes.

David A Axelrod1, Nino Dzebisashvili, Mark A Schnitzler, Paolo R Salvalaggio, Dorry L Segev, Sommer E Gentry, Janet Tuttle-Newhall, Krista L Lentine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Variation in kidney transplant access across the United States may motivate relocation of patients with ability to travel to better-supplied areas. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We examined national transplant registry and U.S. Census data for kidney transplant candidates listed in 1999 to 2009 with a reported residential zip code (n = 203,267). Cox's regression was used to assess associations of socioeconomic status (SES), distance from residence to transplant center, and relocation to a different donation service area (DSA) with transplant access and outcomes.
RESULTS: Patients in the highest SES quartile had increased access to transplant compared with those with lowest SES, driven strongly by 76% higher likelihood of living donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70 to 1.83). Waitlist death was reduced in high compared with low SES candidates (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.89). High SES patients also experienced lower mortality after living and deceased donor transplant. Patients living farther from the transplant center had reduced access to deceased donor transplant and increased risk of post-transplant death. Inter-DSA travel was associated with a dramatic increase in deceased donor transplant access (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.00) and was predicted by high SES, white race, and longer deceased-donor allograft waiting time in initial DSA.
CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing disparities exist in kidney transplantation access and outcomes on the basis of geography and SES despite near-universal insurance coverage under Medicare. Inter-DSA travel improves access and is more common among high SES candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20798250      PMCID: PMC2994090          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04940610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  25 in total

1.  Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?

Authors:  A M Epstein; J Z Ayanian; J H Keogh; S J Noonan; N Armistead; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; J A David-Kasdan; D Carlson; J Fuller; D Marsh; R M Conti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Geographic differences in access to transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Mary D Ellison; Leah B Edwards; Erick B Edwards; Clyde F Barker
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008: the changing face of living donation.

Authors:  D A Axelrod; K P McCullough; E D Brewer; B N Becker; D L Segev; P S Rao
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Cardiovascular health in Puerto Ricans compared to other population groups in the United States.

Authors:  E A Ramírez
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  Delayed referral to a nephrologist: outcomes among patients who survive at least one year on dialysis.

Authors:  Alan Cass; Joan Cunningham; Peter C Arnold; Paul Snelling; Zhiqiang Wang; Wendy Hoy
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-08-05       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Effect of changing the priority for HLA matching on the rates and outcomes of kidney transplantation in minority groups.

Authors:  John P Roberts; Robert A Wolfe; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Sarah H Rush; James J Wynn; Dale A Distant; Valarie B Ashby; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Differences in health-related quality of life and treatment preferences among black and white patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  LeRoi S Hicks; Paul D Cleary; Arnold M Epstein; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor.

Authors:  G C Alexander; A R Sehgal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. San Antonio Heart Study.

Authors:  B D Mitchell; M P Stern; S M Haffner; H P Hazuda; J K Patterson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Nancy J Marth; David C Goodman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  85 in total

1.  Direct Delivery of Kidney Transplant Education to Black and Low-Income Patients Receiving Dialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John Devin Peipert; Anna-Michelle McSorley; Christina J Goalby; Jennifer L Beaumont; Leanne Peace
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  How important is social support in determining patients' suitability for transplantation? Results from a National Survey of Transplant Clinicians.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Joanna Emerson; Zeeshan Butt; Elisa J Gordon; Douglas W Hanto; Jennifer Perloff; Norman Daniels; Tara A Lavelle
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  HOUSES Index as an Innovative Socioeconomic Measure Predicts Graft Failure Among Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Maria A Stevens; Timothy J Beebe; Chung-Ii Wi; Sandra J Taler; Jennifer L St Sauver; Young J Juhn
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Geographic disparities in lung transplant rates.

Authors:  Martin Kosztowski; Sheng Zhou; Errol Bush; Robert S Higgins; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Quality assessment in pancreatic surgery: what might tomorrow require?

Authors:  Brian T Kalish; Charles M Vollmer; Tara S Kent; William H Nealon; Jennifer F Tseng; Mark P Callery
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Kidney transplantation and the intensity of poverty in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Sumit Mohan; Richard Mutell; Rachel E Patzer; James Holt; David Cohen; William McClellan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Geographic determinants of access to pediatric deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Hojun Hwang; Vishnu Potluri; Peter L Abt; Justine Shults; Sandra Amaral
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Mortality and Graft Loss Attributable to Readmission After Kidney Transplantation: Immediate and Long-term Risk.

Authors:  Elizabeth A King; Mary Grace Bowring; Allan B Massie; Lauren M Kucirka; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Fawaz Al-Ammary; Niraj M Desai; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Modifiable patient characteristics and racial disparities in evaluation completion and living donor transplant.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Shelley S Hyland; Melanie S McCabe; Emily A Schenk; Jingxia Liu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Health literacy of living kidney donors and kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Leigh Anne Dageforde; Alec W Petersen; Irene D Feurer; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Kelly A Harms; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Derek E Moore
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.