BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Variation in kidney transplant access across the United States may motivate relocation of patients with ability to travel to better-supplied areas. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We examined national transplant registry and U.S. Census data for kidney transplant candidates listed in 1999 to 2009 with a reported residential zip code (n = 203,267). Cox's regression was used to assess associations of socioeconomic status (SES), distance from residence to transplant center, and relocation to a different donation service area (DSA) with transplant access and outcomes. RESULTS: Patients in the highest SES quartile had increased access to transplant compared with those with lowest SES, driven strongly by 76% higher likelihood of living donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70 to 1.83). Waitlist death was reduced in high compared with low SES candidates (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.89). High SES patients also experienced lower mortality after living and deceased donor transplant. Patients living farther from the transplant center had reduced access to deceased donor transplant and increased risk of post-transplant death. Inter-DSA travel was associated with a dramatic increase in deceased donor transplant access (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.00) and was predicted by high SES, white race, and longer deceased-donor allograft waiting time in initial DSA. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing disparities exist in kidney transplantation access and outcomes on the basis of geography and SES despite near-universal insurance coverage under Medicare. Inter-DSA travel improves access and is more common among high SES candidates.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Variation in kidney transplant access across the United States may motivate relocation of patients with ability to travel to better-supplied areas. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We examined national transplant registry and U.S. Census data for kidney transplant candidates listed in 1999 to 2009 with a reported residential zip code (n = 203,267). Cox's regression was used to assess associations of socioeconomic status (SES), distance from residence to transplant center, and relocation to a different donation service area (DSA) with transplant access and outcomes. RESULTS:Patients in the highest SES quartile had increased access to transplant compared with those with lowest SES, driven strongly by 76% higher likelihood of living donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70 to 1.83). Waitlist death was reduced in high compared with low SES candidates (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.89). High SES patients also experienced lower mortality after living and deceased donor transplant. Patients living farther from the transplant center had reduced access to deceased donor transplant and increased risk of post-transplant death. Inter-DSA travel was associated with a dramatic increase in deceased donor transplant access (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.00) and was predicted by high SES, white race, and longer deceased-donor allograft waiting time in initial DSA. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing disparities exist in kidney transplantation access and outcomes on the basis of geography and SES despite near-universal insurance coverage under Medicare. Inter-DSA travel improves access and is more common among high SES candidates.
Authors: A M Epstein; J Z Ayanian; J H Keogh; S J Noonan; N Armistead; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; J A David-Kasdan; D Carlson; J Fuller; D Marsh; R M Conti Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John P Roberts; Robert A Wolfe; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Sarah H Rush; James J Wynn; Dale A Distant; Valarie B Ashby; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-02-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amy D Waterman; John Devin Peipert; Anna-Michelle McSorley; Christina J Goalby; Jennifer L Beaumont; Leanne Peace Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Keren Ladin; Joanna Emerson; Zeeshan Butt; Elisa J Gordon; Douglas W Hanto; Jennifer Perloff; Norman Daniels; Tara A Lavelle Journal: J Med Ethics Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Maria A Stevens; Timothy J Beebe; Chung-Ii Wi; Sandra J Taler; Jennifer L St Sauver; Young J Juhn Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Martin Kosztowski; Sheng Zhou; Errol Bush; Robert S Higgins; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Brian T Kalish; Charles M Vollmer; Tara S Kent; William H Nealon; Jennifer F Tseng; Mark P Callery Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sumit Mohan; Richard Mutell; Rachel E Patzer; James Holt; David Cohen; William McClellan Journal: Transplantation Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Peter P Reese; Hojun Hwang; Vishnu Potluri; Peter L Abt; Justine Shults; Sandra Amaral Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Elizabeth A King; Mary Grace Bowring; Allan B Massie; Lauren M Kucirka; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Fawaz Al-Ammary; Niraj M Desai; Dorry L Segev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Shelley S Hyland; Melanie S McCabe; Emily A Schenk; Jingxia Liu Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Leigh Anne Dageforde; Alec W Petersen; Irene D Feurer; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Kelly A Harms; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Derek E Moore Journal: Transplantation Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.939