Literature DB >> 2079065

Mechanical efficiency of locomotion in females during different kinds of muscle action.

H Kyröläinen1, P V Komi, P Oksanen, K Häkkinen, S Cheng, D H Kim.   

Abstract

The mechanical efficiencies (ME) of pure positive and pure negative work as well as of stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) exercise were investigated with a special sledge apparatus. The subjects were 20 young females who performed six different types of submaximal exercise: two of pure concentric exercise (positive work), two of pure eccentric exercise (negative work) and two SSC exercises. The work intensities were determined individually, from the recordings of distance obtained during a single maximal concentric exercise. Each exercise involved 60 muscle actions lasting a total of 3 min per testing condition. The MEs of pure positive work with intensities of 30% and 60% maximum (C30 and C60 respectively) were 15.5%, SD 2.6% and 14.3%, SD 1.9%, respectively. In pure negative work, when the dropping heights were 20 cm (E20) and 80 cm (E80), MEs were 28.4%, SD 6.9% and 47.9%, SD 10.1%, respectively. In SSC-exercise, the MEs during the positive phase of the take-off were 31.3%, SD 6.3% (E20/C90) and 35.0%, SD 7.0% (E80/C69). The total MEs in SSC-exercise were 29.1%, SD 4.0% (E20/C90) and 40.1%, SD 5.2% (E80/C60 x 100). In pure negative work, the increased stretching velocity increased the value of ME. In the concentric phase of SSC-exercise, the integrated electromyographic activity (iEMG) of vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) muscles were lower (P less than 0.05) than in pure concentric work, when the mechanical work was the same (C60 vs E80/C60). During pure eccentric work, iEMGs were lower in comparison to the eccentric phase of SSC-exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2079065     DOI: 10.1007/BF00236066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  29 in total

1.  Ia afferent activity during a variety of voluntary movements in the cat.

Authors:  A Prochazka; R A Westerman; S P Ziccone
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The efficiency of bicycle-pedalling, as affected by speed and load.

Authors:  S Dickinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1929-06-07       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M Kaneko
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Negative (eccentric) work. II. Physiological responses to walking uphill and downhill on a motor-driven treadmill.

Authors:  C T Davies; C Barnes
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Positive and negative work performances and their efficiencies in human locomotion.

Authors:  R Margaria
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1968-05-28

6.  Negative and positive work in climbing a laddermill.

Authors:  E Kamon
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Neuromuscular function and mechanical efficiency of human leg extensor muscles during jumping exercises.

Authors:  C Bosco; A Ito; P V Komi; P Luhtanen; P Rahkila; H Rusko; J T Viitasalo
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1982-04

8.  The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces.

Authors:  L G Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Energy expenditure during oxygen deficit of submaximal concentric and eccentric exercise.

Authors:  P Pahud; E Ravussin; K J Acheson; E Jequier
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1980-07

10.  The mechanical efficiency of locomotion in men and women with special emphasis on stretch-shortening cycle exercises.

Authors:  O Aura; P V Komi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986
View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of power training on mechanical efficiency in jumping.

Authors:  H Kyröläinen; J Avela; J M McBride; S Koskinen; J L Andersen; S Sipilä; T E S Takala; P V Komi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Mechanical efficiency and force–time curve variation during repetitive jumping in trained and untrained jumpers.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McBride; James G Snyder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Estimation of errors in mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  P Oksanen; H Kyröläinen; P V Komi; O Aura
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

4.  The errors in "estimation of errors in mechanical efficiency".

Authors:  S Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

5.  Differences in mechanical efficiency between power- and endurance-trained athletes while jumping.

Authors:  H Kyröläinen; P V Komi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

6.  The validity and reliability of a test of lower body musculotendinous stiffness.

Authors:  A D Walshe; G J Wilson; A J Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

7.  Mechanical efficiency during repetitive vertical jumping.

Authors:  Grant O McCaulley; Prue Cormie; Michael J Cavill; James L Nuzzo; Zea G Urbiztondo; Jeffrey M McBride
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.