Literature DB >> 22294292

Mechanical efficiency and force–time curve variation during repetitive jumping in trained and untrained jumpers.

Jeffrey M McBride1, James G Snyder.   

Abstract

Mechanical efficiency (ME), the ratio between work performed and energy expenditure, is a useful criterion in determining the roles of stored elastic energy and chemically deduced energy contributing to concentric performance in stretch-shortening cycle movements. Increased force production during the eccentric phase has been shown to relate to optimal muscle-tendon unit (MTU) length change and thus optimization of usage of stored elastic energy. This phenomenon, as previously reported, is reflected by higher jump heights and ME. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if ME may be different between trained and untrained jumpers and thus be accounted for by variation in force production in the eccentric phase as a reflection of usage of stored elastic energy during various jump types. This investigation involved 9 trained (age 20.7 ± 3.2 years, height 178.6 ± 5.3 cm, body mass 79.0 ± 5.5 kg) and 7 untrained (age 21.43 ± 2.37 years, height 176.17 ± 10.89 cm, body mass 78.8 ± 12.5 kg) male jumpers. Trained subjects were Division I track and field athletes who compete in the horizontal or vertical jumping or running events. Force-time and displacement-time curves were obtained during jumping to determine jump height and to calculate work performed and to observe possible differences in force production in the eccentric phase. Respiratory gases with a metabolic cart were obtained during jumping to calculate energy expenditure. ME was calculated as the ratio between work performed and energy expenditure. The subjects completed four sessions involving 20 repetitions of countermovement jumps (CMJ) and drop jumps from 40 cm (DJ40), 60 cm (DJ60) and 80 cm (DJ80). The trained jumpers jumped significantly higher in the CMJ, DJ40, DJ60 and DJ80 conditions than their untrained counterparts (p ≤ 0.05). ME was significantly higher in the trained in comparison to the untrained jumpers during DJ40. The amount of negative work during all jump types was significantly greater in the trained jumpers. There was a significant correlation between negative work and ME in the trained jumpers (r = 0.82) but not in the untrained jumpers (r = 0.54). The present study indicates that trained jumpers jump higher and have greater ME, possibly as a result of increased for production in the eccentric phase as a reflection of optimal MTU length change and thus increased usage of storage of elastic energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294292     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2327-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  38 in total

Review 1.  Tendon elasticity and muscle function.

Authors:  R McNeill Alexander
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Estimation of errors in mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  P Oksanen; H Kyröläinen; P V Komi; O Aura
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

3.  Effects of power training on muscle structure and neuromuscular performance.

Authors:  H Kyröläinen; J Avela; J M McBride; S Koskinen; J L Andersen; S Sipilä; T E S Takala; P V Komi
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Active leg stiffness and energy stored in the muscles during maximal counter movement jump in the aged.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Chien-Hua Peng; Shun-Hwa Wei; Jung-Chun Chi; Feng-Ren Tsai; Jia-Yean Chen
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Power-time, force-time, and velocity-time curve analysis of the countermovement jump: impact of training.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Jeffrey M McBride; Grant O McCaulley
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Influence of preactivity and eccentric muscle activity on concentric performance during vertical jumping.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McBride; Grant O McCaulley; Prue Cormie
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Power-time, force-time, and velocity-time curve analysis during the jump squat: impact of load.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Jeffrey M McBride; Grant O McCaulley
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Muscular force in running turkeys: the economy of minimizing work.

Authors:  T J Roberts; R L Marsh; P G Weyand; C R Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Drop jumping. II. The influence of dropping height on the biomechanics of drop jumping.

Authors:  M F Bobbert; P A Huijing; G J van Ingen Schenau
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1977-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Drop Height Impacts the Lower Limb Elastic Energy's Utilization for Male High Jumpers: A Experimental Research from Biomechanics.

Authors:  Zehao Tong; Wenjia Chen; Hang Xu; Feng Zhai
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Is a Bimodal Force-Time Curve Related to Countermovement Jump Performance?

Authors:  Rodney A Kennedy; David Drake
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-18

3.  Prolonged cycling lowers subsequent running mechanical efficiency in collegiate triathletes.

Authors:  J A Stewart; E K Merritt; D E Lidstone; J M McBride; K A Zwetsloot
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-01

4.  Biological system energy algorithm reflected in sub-system joint work distribution movement strategies: influence of strength and eccentric loading.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McBride; Sophia Nimphius
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.