Literature DB >> 2078980

Fundamental differences between the nonlinearities of pattern and focal electroretinograms.

E E Sutter.   

Abstract

We directly compared nonlinear kernels of normal human pattern electroretinograms (PERGs) and corresponding localized flash ERGs (FERGs). The FERG was triphasic and resembled an adaptive process because it decayed slowly without changing shape over several kernel orders and interpulse intervals. The PERG was biphasic in the slice nearest the diagonal of the second-order kernel, similar to the FERG in slices farther from this diagonal, and without power in higher-order kernels. The unique PERG features were short-term effects that immediately followed a contrast transition. The appearance-disappearance PERG had a triphasic first-order kernel and a biphasic second-order kernel. The latter was similar to, but half the size of, that for the contrast-reversal PERG. When the first off-diagonal slices of the two PERG second-order kernels were analyzed in detail, we found in both that the first positive peak was larger than the FERG at intermediate spatial frequencies. Both PERG peaks in the slice had a low contrast threshold and were linear with contrast. The three FERG peaks of the corresponding FERG slice had a higher threshold and were saturated with increasing contrast. These observations show that the PERG contains substantial pattern specific nonlinear components and cannot be dismissed as merely the nonlinear subcomponents of the corresponding FERG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2078980     DOI: 10.1007/BF00140494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  37 in total

1.  Differences between electroretinograms of cat and primate.

Authors:  R F Hess; C L Baker; E Zrenner; J Schwarzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram.

Authors:  G S Brindley; G Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Spatial contrast transfer functions of the pattern-evoked electroretinogram.

Authors:  M Korth; R Rix; O Sembritzki
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Pigeon pattern electroretinogram: a response unaffected by chronic section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  P Bagnoli; V Porciatti; W Francesconi; R Barsellotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram.

Authors:  R F Hess; C L Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Contribution from proximal retina to intraretinal pattern ERG: the M-wave.

Authors:  P A Sieving; R H Steinberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini; S Bisti; H Holländer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings in the cat.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Flash and pattern electroretinograms in normal and laser-induced glaucomatous primate eyes.

Authors:  M S Marx; S M Podos; I Bodis-Wollner; J R Howard-Williams; M J Siegel; C S Teitelbaum; E L Maclin; C Severin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of refractive blur on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Palmowski; T Berninger; R Allgayer; H Andrielis; B Heinemann-Vernaleken; G Rudolph
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.