Literature DB >> 3783218

Differences between electroretinograms of cat and primate.

R F Hess, C L Baker, E Zrenner, J Schwarzer.   

Abstract

We compared the electroretinogram (ERG) evoked by pattern and uniform field stimulation using steady-state analysis in cat, monkey, and human. Evidence is provided that the pattern-evoked ERG is different in cat and primate. In primate it exhibits a resonance at 8 Hz, a spatial band-pass characteristic, contrast linearity, and no scotopic component. None of these properties are seen in the response to 8-Hz modulation in cat. The ERG evoked by a sinusoidally modulated uniform field of light is composed of a fundamental and a second harmonic component. Although the properties of the fundamental response are similar in cat and primate, the second harmonic response exhibits important differences in its temporal response and luminance dependence. The correspondence between the properties of the pattern-evoked ERG and those of the second harmonic component of the uniform field stimulus in primates suggests a common generator that is different from that of the fundamental response to uniform field stimulation. These differences in the properties of the pattern ERG in cat and primate may suggest either a different generator in cat or one with substantially different properties. This should be taken into account in animal models for the generators of the human pattern ERG response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3783218     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.3.747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Transient and steady state focal and pattern electroretinogram nerve section losses in cats with unilateral optic.

Authors:  P J Anderton; T J Millar
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Inner-retinal contributions to the photopic sinusoidal flicker electroretinogram of macaques. Macaque photopic sinusoidal flicker ERG.

Authors:  Suresh Viswanathan; Laura J Frishman; John G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Fundamental differences between the nonlinearities of pattern and focal electroretinograms.

Authors:  E E Sutter
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Combined application of BDNF to the eye and brain enhances ganglion cell survival and function in the cat after optic nerve injury.

Authors:  Arthur J Weber; Suresh Viswanáthan; Chidambaram Ramanathan; Christine D Harman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Electrophysiological assessment of retinal ganglion cell function.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Computation of the luminance and pattern components of the bar pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  D A Thompson; N Drasdo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Surgical therapy for obesity can induce a vitamin A deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  M Anastasi; M Lauricella; F Ponte
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Spatial-temporal interactions in the steady-state pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  S Padovano; B Falsini; P Ciavarella; G Moretti; V Porciatti
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Pattern ERG in rats following section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  N Berardi; L Domenici; A Gravina; L Maffei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The electrical response of the human eye to patterned stimuli: clinical observations.

Authors:  E Dodt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.