Literature DB >> 2074465

Biosonar behavior of mustached bats swung on a pendulum prior to cortical ablation.

S J Gaioni1, H Riquimaroux, N Suga.   

Abstract

1. The biosonar signal (pulse) of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, has four harmonics (H1-4), each consisting of a long constant-frequency component (CF1-4) followed by a short frequency-modulated component (FM1-4). As the bat approaches a target, it systematically modifies its pulses to optimize the extraction of information from the echoes. These behavioral responses include 1) Doppler-shift (DS) compensation in which the bat adjusts the frequency of its pulses to correct for the DS in the echoes. This maintains the echo CF2 at a frequency to which the bat's cochlea is very sharply tuned, slightly above the CF2 frequency of the bat's pulses when it is at rest (Frest, approximately 61 kHz); 2) echo intensity compensation, in which the bat lowers its pulse intensity as it approaches a large target, thus maintaining the echo intensity within a suitable range for auditory processing; and 3) and 4) duration and rate adjustments, in which the bat first increases its pulse duration to facilitate target identification, then shortens its pulse duration while increasing its pulse rate to facilitate target analysis. 2. We examined these responses, especially DS compensation, by swinging bats on a pendulum toward a large target over a distance of 3.6 m. Eight bats were given 15-30 swings per day for 6-25 days. 1) On 97% of all swings the bats showed strong DS compensation as the pendulum approached the target. They did not show DS compensation on the backswing. 2) On 40-50% of all swings, the bats clearly displayed the other responses. The bats typically increased their pulse intensity a small amount early in the pendulum swing, then decreased pulse intensity by as much as 18 dB as the target was more closely approached. They increased their pulse intensity during the backswing. 3) Pulse duration increased from approximately 20 to 23 ms early in the forward swing, decreased to approximately 18 ms as the target was more closely approached, and then increased to 20 ms by the end of the backswing. 4) The instantaneous repetition rate increased from approximately 17 pulses/s at the start of the forward swing to approximately 28 pulses/s near the target, then decreased to approximately 10 pulses/s by the end of the backswing. Pulses usually occurred in trains of 1-2 pulses, with longer trains occasionally occurring near the target. 3. The maximum DS on the pendulum was 1.34 kHz, and the maximum DS compensation was 146 +/- 98 (SD) Hz less than this value.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2074465     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.6.1801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Fine control of call frequency by horseshoe bats.

Authors:  M Smotherman; W Metzner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  The sense of touch in the star-nosed mole: from mechanoreceptors to the brain.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Convergence of reference frequencies by multiple CF-FM bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) during paired flights evaluated with onboard microphones.

Authors:  Yuto Furusawa; Shizuko Hiryu; Kohta I Kobayasi; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Echolocation behavior of the Japanese horseshoe bat in pursuit of fluttering prey.

Authors:  Shigeki Mantani; Shizuko Hiryu; Emyo Fujioka; Naohiro Matsuta; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Auditory fovea and Doppler shift compensation: adaptations for flutter detection in echolocating bats using CF-FM signals.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Intra-individual variation in the vocalized frequency of the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros terasensis, influenced by conspecific colony members.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Koji Katsura; Tsuyoshi Nagato; Hideo Yamazaki; Liang-Kong Lin; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Yu Shiori; Tatsuro Hosokawa; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. I. Concomitant shifts in biosonar emission frequency.

Authors:  R F Huffman; O W Henson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The tiny difference between foraging and communication buzzes uttered by the Mexican free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis.

Authors:  Christine Schwartz; Jedidiah Tressler; Halli Keller; Marc Vanzant; Sarah Ezell; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.