Literature DB >> 20739920

Communicating pharmacogenetic research results to breastfeeding mothers taking codeine: a pilot study of perceptions and benefits.

P Madadi1, Y Joly, D Avard, D C Chitayat, M A Smith, C J D Ross, B C Carleton, M R Hayden, G Koren.   

Abstract

Sixty-two codeine-prescribed breastfeeding mothers from a pharmacogenetic study were interviewed regarding the communication of individual CYP2D6 genotype results and overall research findings. All participants wanted to receive the results of their individual genetic tests; however, individuals placed different values on the usefulness of this information toward future medical decisions. Receiving one's pharmacogenetic test results was not associated with a negative psychosocial impact. Thirty-three percent of the participants wished to withhold these results from their physicians. Participants' expectations seem to dictate the extent of transparency of pharmacogenetic research results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739920     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2010.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  13 in total

Review 1.  Value of Supportive Care Pharmacogenomics in Oncology Practice.

Authors:  Jai N Patel; Lauren A Wiebe; Henry M Dunnenberger; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-05

Review 2.  Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Hayden Bosworth
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-06-21

3.  Patient experiences with pharmacogenetic testing in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Jivan Moaddeb; Nancy Allen Lapointe; Alex Cho; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Prior opioid exposure influences parents' sharing of their children's CYP2D6 research results.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers; Xue Zhang; Brooke McLaughlin; Diane Kissell; Cassandra L Perry; Matthew Veerkamp; Kejian Zhang; Ingrid A Holm; Cynthia A Prows
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 5.  Ethical perspectives on translational pharmacogenetic research involving children.

Authors:  Parvaz Madadi
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  An inter-professional approach to personalized medicine education: one institution's experience.

Authors:  Christine M Formea; Wayne T Nicholson; Carolyn Rohrer Vitek
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 7.  Clinical implementation of drug metabolizing gene-based therapeutic interventions worldwide.

Authors:  Evangelia Eirini Tsermpini; Zeina N Al-Mahayri; Bassam R Ali; George P Patrinos
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Consideration of patient preferences and challenges in storage and access of pharmacogenetic test results.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Kensaku Kawamoto; Robert Agans; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Delivering pharmacogenetic testing in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Deepak Voora; Bruce Peyser; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2013-09-18

10.  Physician-Reported Benefits and Barriers to Clinical Implementation of Genomic Medicine: A Multi-Site IGNITE-Network Survey.

Authors:  Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Kezhen Fei; Kenneth D Levy; Amanda R Elsey; Toni I Pollin; Andrea H Ramirez; Kristin W Weitzel; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.