Literature DB >> 20739690

Assessing tooth color differences in digital facial portraits.

D T Lindsey1, A G Wee.   

Abstract

Although a large body of scientific literature shows that background color and luminance affect color perception, previous measurements of tooth color difference thresholds have not taken the effects of viewing context into account. The present study tested the hypothesis that differences in skin/gingival color influence individuals' judgments of tooth color differences. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were determined in 10 individuals using a signal detection paradigm. They evaluated 500 pseudo-random presentations of two facial portraits: an African-American and a Caucasian. These portraits varied trial-to-trial only in the direction (CIELAB +L*, +a*, or +b*) or magnitude of the color difference between a portrait's two central incisors. The individuals were significantly less sensitive to tooth color differences in the +L* direction in the Caucasian portrait than for any other combination of color direction or portrait type. Furthermore, comparable perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were generally not statistically significant from each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739690      PMCID: PMC2975495          DOI: 10.1177/0022034510376772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  16 in total

1.  Brightness, discriminability and the "crispening effect".

Authors:  P Whittle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effect of field size and chromatic surroundings on colar discrimination.

Authors:  W R J BROWN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1952-11

3.  Contrast in complex images.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Perceptibility and acceptability of CIELAB color differences in computer-simulated teeth.

Authors:  Delwin T Lindsey; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.

Authors:  R Duane Douglas; Tad J Steinhauer; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Measurement of color for craniofacial structures using a 45/0-degree optical configuration.

Authors:  David J Gozalo-Diaz; Delwin T Lindsey; William M Johnston; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns.

Authors:  R D Douglas; J D Brewer
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain.

Authors:  R R Seghi; E R Hewlett; J Kim
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers.

Authors:  I E Ruyter; K Nilner; B Moller
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: implications of probit analysis.

Authors:  S P McKee; S A Klein; D Y Teller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.