Literature DB >> 20739493

Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile within 24 hours.

John D Perry1, Kerry Asir, Diane Halimi, Sylvain Orenga, Joanne Dale, Michelle Payne, Ruth Carlton, Jim Evans, F Kate Gould.   

Abstract

Rapid and effective methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples are desirable to obtain isolates for typing or to facilitate accurate diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. We report on the evaluation of a prototype chromogenic medium (ID C. difficile prototype [IDCd]) for isolation of C. difficile. The chromogenic medium was compared using (i) 368 untreated stool samples that were also inoculated onto CLO medium, (ii) 339 stool samples that were subjected to alcohol shock and also inoculated onto five distinct selective agars, and (iii) standardized suspensions of 10 C. difficile ribotypes (untreated and alcohol treated) that were also inoculated onto five distinct selective agars. Two hundred thirty-six isolates of C. difficile were recovered from 368 untreated stool samples, and all but 1 of these strains (99.6%) were recovered on IDCd within 24 h, whereas 74.6% of isolates were recovered on CLO medium after 48 h. Of 339 alcohol-treated stool samples cultured onto IDCd and five other selective agars, C. difficile was recovered from 218 samples using a combination of all media. The use of IDCd allowed recovery of 96.3% of isolates within 24 h, whereas 51 to 83% of isolates were recovered within 24 h using the five other media. Finally, when they were challenged with pure cultures, all 10 ribotypes of C. difficile generated higher colony counts on IDCd irrespective of alcohol pretreatment or duration of incubation. We conclude that IDCd is an effective medium for isolation of C. difficile from stool samples within 24 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739493      PMCID: PMC3020817          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01288-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  29 in total

1.  Value of lysozyme agar incorporation and alkaline thioglycollate exposure for the environmental recovery of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  M H Wilcox; W N Fawley; P Parnell
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: microbiologists (should) do it with culture.

Authors:  A Sasha Jaksic; Graeme R Nimmo; Brian W Dwyer
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.306

3.  [Evaluation of four rapid methods for the investigation of the toxigenic capacity of Clostridium difficile strains isolated in a selective medium].

Authors:  A García; J L Pérez; A Pulido; J Niubó; P Pérez; R Martín
Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Comparison of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and taurocholate-CCFA for recovery of Clostridium difficile during surveillance of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  D Z Bliss; S Johnson; C R Clabots; K Savik; D N Gerding
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 5.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture.

Authors:  Michel Delmée; Johan Van Broeck; Anne Simon; Michèle Janssens; Véronique Avesani
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Authors:  Kerrie Eastwood; Patrick Else; André Charlett; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile-infection (CDI).

Authors:  M J T Crobach; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  New selective medium for isolating Clostridium difficile from faeces.

Authors:  S T Aspinall; D N Hutchinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Lukas Fenner; Andreas F Widmer; Gisela Goy; Sonja Rudin; Reno Frei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Guidelines for optimal surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals.

Authors:  J S Brazier; B I Duerden
Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health       Date:  1998-12
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  A Decade of Development of Chromogenic Culture Media for Clinical Microbiology in an Era of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  John D Perry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  A cost-effective approach for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: toxigenic culture using ChromID Clostridium difficile agar.

Authors:  Shik Luk; Wing Kin To; Tak Keung Ng; Wai Ting Hui; Wing Keung Lee; Florence Lau; Almond Man Wai Ching
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium.

Authors:  A Olling; H Leidinger; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture.

Authors:  M B F Jensen; K E P Olsen; X C Nielsen; A M Hoegh; R B Dessau; T Atlung; J Engberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Mild or Malign: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Clostridium difficile Infection in Thailand.

Authors:  Korakrit Imwattana; Papanin Putsathit; Teera Leepattarakit; Pattarachai Kiratisin; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the chromogenic agar chromID C. difficile.

Authors:  Catherine Eckert; Béatrice Burghoffer; Valérie Lalande; Frederic Barbut
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the fully automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile assays for direct detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Markus Zorn; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Isolation and Identification of Clostridium difficile Using ChromID C. difficile Medium Combined With Gram Staining and PRO Disc Testing: A Proposal for a Simple Culture Process.

Authors:  Kyung Sun Park; Chang-Seok Ki; Nam Yong Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Comparison of ChromID agar and Clostridium difficile selective agar for effective isolation of C. difficile from stool specimens.

Authors:  Bo-Moon Shin; Eun Joo Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.