Literature DB >> 20739247

A qualitative analysis of the content of telephone calls made by women to a dedicated 'Next Birth After Caesarean' antenatal clinic.

Sara David1, Jennifer Fenwick, Sara Bayes, Tracy Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 'Next Birth After Caesarean' (NBAC) clinic is a dedicated service for women who have had a previous caesarean section. The midwifery-led clinic commenced at a tertiary hospital in Western Australia in 2008. As part of this service, access to a midwife via telephone is available. AIM: This paper aims to provide maternity health care providers with an increased understanding of, and insight into, the different information needs of this specific group of maternity care consumers.
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyse the content of 170 telephone calls made by women to the NBAC clinic over a period of 16 months (July 2008-November 2009).
RESULTS: Six distinct categories of calls were elicited from the analysis process with the majority of calls related to women seeking information and support about the option of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). These were labeled: 'Wanting and seeking a VBAC'; 'Is VBAC a possiblility?'; 'Seeking clarification and cross-checking information in the face of opposition'; 'Existing NBAC clients checking in/checking out'; 'Feeling distressed and disappointed; wanting to talk' and 'Professional inquiry about NBAC service'. DISCUSSION: It is acknowledged that women require access to non-biased information to be able to make informed decisions about birth after caesarean. However there remains limited evidence on the precise informational needs of these women. It appears from our findings that this particular group of maternity service consumers requires opportunities to discuss their particular needs within the context of their individual childbearing experiences.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence is provided that a telephone service led by midwives may be one effective strategy to meet women's informational needs and address decisional conflict in relation to options for birth after a caesarean section.
Copyright © 2010 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739247     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  8 in total

1.  Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Clinician's and women's perceptions of individual barriers to vaginal birth after cesarean in Iran: A qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Firoozi; Fatemeh Tara; Mohammad Reza Ahanchian; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2020-05

Review 3.  Telephone support for women during pregnancy and the first six weeks postpartum.

Authors:  Tina Lavender; Yana Richens; Stephen J Milan; Rebecca M D Smyth; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-18

4.  Using healthcare failure mode and effect analysis as a method of vaginal birth after caesarean section management.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Wei Zhu; Shiguan Le; Wenxian Wu; Qun Huang; Weiwei Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section).

Authors:  Ingela Lundgren; Cecily Begley; Mechthild M Gross; Terese Bondas
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Study protocol for reducing childbirth fear: a midwife-led psycho-education intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer Fenwick; Jenny Gamble; Debra K Creedy; Anne Buist; Erika Turkstra; Anne Sneddon; Paul A Scuffham; Elsa L Ryding; Vivian Jarrett; Jocelyn Toohill
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices.

Authors:  Mairead Black; Vikki A Entwistle; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Women's and communities' views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.