Literature DB >> 20739217

Peripheral electrical stimulation to induce cortical plasticity: a systematic review of stimulus parameters.

L S Chipchase1, S M Schabrun2, P W Hodges2.   

Abstract

Peripheral electrical stimulation (ES) is commonly used as an intervention to facilitate movement and relieve pain in a variety of conditions. It is widely accepted that ES induces rapid plastic change in the motor cortex. This leads to the exciting possibility that ES could be used to drive cortical plasticity in movement disorders, such as stroke, and conditions where pain affects motor control. This paper aimed to critically review the literature to determine which parameters induced cortical plasticity in healthy individuals using ES. A literature search located papers that assessed plasticity in the primary motor cortex of adult humans. Studies that evaluated plasticity using change in the amplitude of potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex were included. Details from each study including sample size, ES parameters and reported findings were extracted and compared. Where data were available, Cohen's standardised mean differences (SMD) were calculated. Nineteen studies were located. Of the parameters evaluated, variation of the intensity of peripheral ES appeared to have the most consistent effect on modulation of excitability of corticomotor pathway to stimulated muscles. There was a trend for stimulation above motor threshold to increase excitability (SMD 0.79 mV, CI -0.10 to 1.64). Stimulation below motor threshold, but sufficient to induce sensory perception, produced conflicting results. Further studies with consistent methodology and larger subject numbers are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. There also appeared to be a time effect. That is, longer periods of ES induced more sustained changes in cortical excitability. There is insufficient evidence to determine the effect of other stimulation parameters such as frequency and waveform. Further research is needed to confirm whether modulation of these parameters affects plastic change.
Copyright © 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739217     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  59 in total

1.  Modulation of motor unit activity in biceps brachii by neuromuscular electrical stimulation applied to the contralateral arm.

Authors:  Ioannis G Amiridis; Diba Mani; Awad Almuklass; Boris Matkowski; Jeffrey R Gould; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-04-30

2.  Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

Authors:  Emmet McNickle; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation modulates interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sidney Grosprêtre; Paul Stapley; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Combined effect of motor imagery and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on the motor cortex.

Authors:  Kei Saito; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Naoshin Yoshida; Shigeo Tanabe; Kunitsugu Kondo; Kenichi Sugawara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ethne L Nussbaum; Pamela Houghton; Joseph Anthony; Sandy Rennie; Barbara L Shay; Alison M Hoens
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Resurgence of peripheral nerve stimulation with innovation in device technologies.

Authors:  Eellan Sivanesan; Amitabh Gulati
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 6.288

7.  Somatosensory perturbations influence cortical activity associated with single-limb balance performance.

Authors:  David A Sherman; Tim Lehmann; Jochen Baumeister; Dustin R Grooms; Grant E Norte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Enhanced somatosensory feedback modulates cutaneous reflexes in arm muscles during self-triggered or prolonged stimulation.

Authors:  Yao Sun; Gregory E P Pearcey; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Therapeutic Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Acupoints on Motor and Neural Recovery of the Affected Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Reem M Alwhaibi; Noha F Mahmoud; Hoda M Zakaria; Walaa M Ragab; Nisreen N Al Awaji; Mahmoud Y Elzanaty; Hager R Elserougy
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  Real-time changes in corticospinal excitability during voluntary contraction with concurrent electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Kenichi Sugawara; Satoshi Tanaka; Naoshin Yoshida; Kei Saito; Shigeo Tanabe; Yoshihiro Muraoka; Meigen Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.