Literature DB >> 27832594

High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation modulates interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans.

Nicolas Gueugneau1,2, Sidney Grosprêtre3,2, Paul Stapley4, Romuald Lepers3,2.   

Abstract

High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (HF NMES) induces muscular contractions through neural mechanisms that partially match physiological motor control. Indeed, a portion of the contraction arises from central mechanisms, whereby spinal motoneurons are recruited through the evoked sensory volley. However, the involvement of supraspinal centers of motor control during such stimulation remains poorly understood. Therefore, we tested whether a single HF NMES session applied to the upper limb influences interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from left to right motor cortex (M1). Using noninvasive electrophysiology and transcranial magnetic stimulation, we evaluated the effects of a 10-min HF NMES session applied to a right wrist flexor on spinal and corticospinal excitability of both arms, as well as IHI, in healthy subjects. HF NMES induced a rapid decline in spinal excitability on the right stimulated side that closely matched the modulation of evoked force during the protocol. More importantly, IHI was significantly increased by HF NMES, and this increase was correlated to the electromyographic activity within the contralateral homologous muscle. Our study highlights a new neurophysiological mechanism, suggesting that HF NMES has an effect on the excitability of the transcallosal pathway probably to regulate the lateralization of the motor output. The data suggest that HF NMES can modify the hemispheric balance between both M1 areas. These findings provide important novel perspectives for the implementation of HF NMES in sport training and neurorehabilitation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (HF NMES) induces muscular contractions that partially match physiological motor control. Here, we tested whether HF NMES applied to the upper limb influences interhemispheric inhibition. Our results show that interhemispheric inhibition was increased after HF NMES and that this increase was correlated to the electromyographic activity within the contralateral homologous muscle. This opens up original perspectives for the implementation of HF NMES in sport training and neurorehabilitation.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corticospinal excitability; upper limb

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27832594      PMCID: PMC5263217          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00355.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  62 in total

1.  Changes in interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine-motor manipulation task.

Authors:  Takuya Morishita; Kazumasa Uehara; Kozo Funase
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: triceps surae.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; D F Collins
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-12-23

3.  Transcallosal sensorimotor integration: effects of sensory input on cortical projections to the contralateral hand.

Authors:  Orlando Swayne; John Rothwell; Karin Rosenkranz
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Interhemispheric motor inhibition: its role in controlling electromyographic mirror activity.

Authors:  Annemarie Hübers; Yuriy Orekhov; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Extra Forces induced by wide-pulse, high-frequency electrical stimulation: Occurrence, magnitude, variability and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer Wegrzyk; Alexandre Fouré; Christophe Vilmen; Badih Ghattas; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Nicolas Place; David Bendahan; Julien Gondin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Corticospinal excitability is dependent on the parameters of peripheral electric stimulation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Lucy S Chipchase; Siobhan M Schabrun; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M C Ridding; D R McKay; P D Thompson; T S Miles
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  On the mechanism of the post-activation depression of the H-reflex in human subjects.

Authors:  H Hultborn; M Illert; J Nielsen; A Paul; M Ballegaard; H Wiese
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; P Mazzone; A Insola; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Task-Oriented Mirror Therapy Training on Hand Rehabilitation of Acute Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Jinhong Kim; Jongeun Yim
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-02-06

Review 2.  A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Shi Zhou; Shuang-Shuang Zhang; Zachary J Crowley-McHattan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Modulation of spinal excitability following neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed to voluntary contraction.

Authors:  Riccardo Borzuola; Luciana Labanca; Andrea Macaluso; Luca Laudani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.