OBJECTIVES: To determine whether objectively measured physical activity levels are associated with physical function and mobility in older men. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Academic research center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two community-dwelling men aged 65 and older with self-reported mobility limitations were divided into a low-activity and a high-activity group based on the median average daily physical activity counts of the whole sample. MEASUREMENTS: Physical activity according to triaxial accelerometers; physical function and mobility according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), gait speed, stair climb time, and a lift-and-lower task; aerobic capacity according to maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2) max); and leg press and chest press maximal strength and peak power. RESULTS: Older men with higher physical activity levels had a 1.4-point higher mean SPPB score and a 0.35-m/s faster walking speed than those with lower physical activity levels. They also climbed a standard flight of stairs 1.85 seconds faster and completed 60% more shelves in a lift-and-lower task (all P<.01); muscle strength and power measures were not significantly different between the low- and high-activity groups. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression models showed that physical activity is positively associated with all physical function and mobility measures, leg press strength, and VO(2) max. CONCLUSION: Older men with higher physical activity levels demonstrate better physical function and mobility than their less-active peers. Moreover, physical activity levels are predictive of performance in measures of physical function and mobility in older men. Future work is needed to determine whether modifications in physical activity levels can improve or preserve physical performance in later life.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether objectively measured physical activity levels are associated with physical function and mobility in older men. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Academic research center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two community-dwelling men aged 65 and older with self-reported mobility limitations were divided into a low-activity and a high-activity group based on the median average daily physical activity counts of the whole sample. MEASUREMENTS: Physical activity according to triaxial accelerometers; physical function and mobility according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), gait speed, stair climb time, and a lift-and-lower task; aerobic capacity according to maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2) max); and leg press and chest press maximal strength and peak power. RESULTS: Older men with higher physical activity levels had a 1.4-point higher mean SPPB score and a 0.35-m/s faster walking speed than those with lower physical activity levels. They also climbed a standard flight of stairs 1.85 seconds faster and completed 60% more shelves in a lift-and-lower task (all P<.01); muscle strength and power measures were not significantly different between the low- and high-activity groups. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression models showed that physical activity is positively associated with all physical function and mobility measures, leg press strength, and VO(2) max. CONCLUSION: Older men with higher physical activity levels demonstrate better physical function and mobility than their less-active peers. Moreover, physical activity levels are predictive of performance in measures of physical function and mobility in older men. Future work is needed to determine whether modifications in physical activity levels can improve or preserve physical performance in later life.
Authors: T Rantanen; J M Guralnik; R Sakari-Rantala; S Leveille; E M Simonsick; S Ling; L P Fried Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Milan Chang; Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Luigi Ferrucci; Suzanne Leveille; Stefano Volpato; Nathalie de Rekeneire; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer Weuve; Jae Hee Kang; JoAnn E Manson; Monique M B Breteler; James H Ware; Francine Grodstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-09-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jungwha Lee; Rowland W Chang; Linda Ehrlich-Jones; C Kent Kwoh; Michael Nevitt; Pamela A Semanik; Leena Sharma; Min-Woong Sohn; Jing Song; Dorothy D Dunlop Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: M P Corcoran; K K H Chui; D K White; K F Reid; D Kirn; M E Nelson; J M Sacheck; S C Folta; R A Fielding Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Robert J Dawe; Sue E Leurgans; Jingyun Yang; Joshua M Bennett; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Andrew S Lim; Chris Gaiteri; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kazuki Hotta; Bradley J Behnke; Bahram Arjmandi; Payal Ghosh; Bei Chen; Rachael Brooks; Joshua J Maraj; Marcus L Elam; Patrick Maher; Daniel Kurien; Alexandra Churchill; Jaime L Sepulveda; Max B Kabolowsky; Demetra D Christou; Judy M Muller-Delp Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Elizabeth C Lorenz; Andrea L Cheville; Hatem Amer; Brian R Kotajarvi; Mark D Stegall; Tanya M Petterson; Walter K Kremers; Fernando G Cosio; Nathan K LeBrasseur Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 2.863