OBJECTIVES: This study aims to validate the ability to perform depression screening with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and PHQ-9 depression modules in a busy, outpatient practice, and to evaluate the prevalence of depression among lung cancer outpatients at our institution. METHODS: In 2010, 64 patients in a thoracic malignancy clinic completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Patients endorsing either one or both items were then given the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, a nine-item depression assessment tool. Patients with mild or worse depression were offered a referral to a mental health care provider. RESULTS: Eighteen of 64 patients (28 %) endorsed one or both items on the PHQ-2. Thirteen of 18 patients with a positive PHQ-2 screen completed the PHQ-9, with mean score of 10.2 (SD 3.91), suggesting moderate depression. PHQ-9 item 4, evaluating fatigue, was positive in 12 patients, and PHQ-9 item 9, evaluating suicidal ideation, was never reported. Only 1 of 18 patients with a positive PHQ-2 screen was being followed by a psychiatrist, and no patient accepted a new referral to a mental health provider. CONCLUSIONS: The PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 modules are an effective means of depression screening in a busy, outpatient clinic. A high prevalence of depression was reported; yet, suicidal ideation was not reported. Depression severity ranged from mild to severe. The most endorsed PHQ-9 item was fatigue, although it is uncertain if this reflects a symptom of depression, a sequela of lung cancer itself, or both. The lung cancer patients in this sample who reported depression were unlikely to receive mental health services.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to validate the ability to perform depression screening with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and PHQ-9 depression modules in a busy, outpatient practice, and to evaluate the prevalence of depression among lung cancer outpatients at our institution. METHODS: In 2010, 64 patients in a thoracic malignancy clinic completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Patients endorsing either one or both items were then given the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, a nine-item depression assessment tool. Patients with mild or worse depression were offered a referral to a mental health care provider. RESULTS: Eighteen of 64 patients (28 %) endorsed one or both items on the PHQ-2. Thirteen of 18 patients with a positive PHQ-2 screen completed the PHQ-9, with mean score of 10.2 (SD 3.91), suggesting moderate depression. PHQ-9 item 4, evaluating fatigue, was positive in 12 patients, and PHQ-9 item 9, evaluating suicidal ideation, was never reported. Only 1 of 18 patients with a positive PHQ-2 screen was being followed by a psychiatrist, and no patient accepted a new referral to a mental health provider. CONCLUSIONS: The PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 modules are an effective means of depression screening in a busy, outpatient clinic. A high prevalence of depression was reported; yet, suicidal ideation was not reported. Depression severity ranged from mild to severe. The most endorsed PHQ-9 item was fatigue, although it is uncertain if this reflects a symptom of depression, a sequela of lung cancer itself, or both. The lung cancerpatients in this sample who reported depression were unlikely to receive mental health services.
Authors: Paul B Jacobsen; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; William J Fulp; Carlos Alemany; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; Richard Brown; Thomas Cartwright; Douglas Faig; George Kim; Richard Levine; Merry-Jennifer Markham; Fred Schreiber; Philip Sharp; Mokenge Malafa Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kathleen Ell; Bin Xie; Brenda Quon; David I Quinn; Megan Dwight-Johnson; Pey-Jiuan Lee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: William F Pirl; Joseph A Greer; Lara Traeger; Vicki Jackson; Inga T Lennes; Emily R Gallagher; Pedro Perez-Cruz; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer S Temel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jesse R Fann; Donna L Berry; Seth Wolpin; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Barbara Halpenny; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: John W Williams; Michael Pignone; Gilbert Ramirez; Christina Perez Stellato Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Doreen Koretz; Kathleen R Merikangas; A John Rush; Ellen E Walters; Philip S Wang Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sharon L Sanders; Erin O Bantum; Jason E Owen; Andrea A Thornton; Annette L Stanton Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Stuart L Goldberg; Dhakshila Paramanathan; Raya Khoury; Sharmi Patel; Dayo Jagun; Srikesh Arunajadai; Victoria DeVincenzo; Ruth Pe Benito; Brooke Gruman; Sukhi Kaur; Scott Paddock; Andrew D Norden; Eric V Schultz; John Hervey; Terrill Jordan; Andre Goy; Andrew L Pecora Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-09-28
Authors: David E Gerber; Heidi A Hamann; Noel O Santini; Suhny Abbara; Hsienchang Chiu; Molly McGuire; Lisa Quirk; Hong Zhu; Simon J Craddock Lee Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 2.226