PURPOSE: Depression is a significant concern in outpatient oncology care, yet clinicians face practical challenges in accurately and efficiently screening patients for it. This study investigated whether a single item or multiple items from an existing multisymptom scale, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), might serve as effective initial screens for depressed mood. METHODS: Data were collected from two cohorts of patients. Cohort 1 comprised 187 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who completed the Beck Depression Inventory II; cohort 2 comprised 281 patients with renal cell carcinoma who completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. All patients completed the MDASI. Single-item and multiple-item MDASI solutions were identified using cohort 1 and validated in cohort 2. Sensitivity and specificity of the solutions were assessed through binary linear regression; cut points were identified using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The MDASI single item "sadness" was the best solution identified in cohort 1 for screening for depressed mood relative to other affective items (distress, enjoyment of life, mood). At a cut point ≥ 4 (0 to 10 scale), the "sadness" item exhibited a clinically acceptable specificity of 81.5%, sensitivity of 72.0%, a negative predictive value of 95.0%, and a positive predictive value of 37.5%. This solution was successfully validated in cohort 2. CONCLUSION: The MDASI "sadness" item has modest sensitivity and high negative predictive value and can serve as a useful initial screen for depressed mood. This approach may improve the efficiency and acceptability of depression screening for both clinicians and patients.
PURPOSE:Depression is a significant concern in outpatient oncology care, yet clinicians face practical challenges in accurately and efficiently screening patients for it. This study investigated whether a single item or multiple items from an existing multisymptom scale, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), might serve as effective initial screens for depressed mood. METHODS: Data were collected from two cohorts of patients. Cohort 1 comprised 187 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who completed the Beck Depression Inventory II; cohort 2 comprised 281 patients with renal cell carcinoma who completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. All patients completed the MDASI. Single-item and multiple-item MDASI solutions were identified using cohort 1 and validated in cohort 2. Sensitivity and specificity of the solutions were assessed through binary linear regression; cut points were identified using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The MDASI single item "sadness" was the best solution identified in cohort 1 for screening for depressed mood relative to other affective items (distress, enjoyment of life, mood). At a cut point ≥ 4 (0 to 10 scale), the "sadness" item exhibited a clinically acceptable specificity of 81.5%, sensitivity of 72.0%, a negative predictive value of 95.0%, and a positive predictive value of 37.5%. This solution was successfully validated in cohort 2. CONCLUSION: The MDASI "sadness" item has modest sensitivity and high negative predictive value and can serve as a useful initial screen for depressed mood. This approach may improve the efficiency and acceptability of depression screening for both clinicians and patients.
Authors: Esther Kim; Thierry Jahan; Bradley E Aouizerat; Marylin J Dodd; Bruce A Cooper; Steven M Paul; Claudia West; Kathryn Lee; Patrick S Swift; William Wara; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Joseph Low; Sue Gessler; Rachael Williams; Emma Daniells; Veronica Brough; Adrian Tookman; Louise Jones Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2009-04-02 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Larissa A Meyer; Alpa M Nick; Qiuling Shi; Xin Shelley Wang; Loretta Williams; Tremaine Brock; Maria D Iniesta; Kelly Rangel; Karen H Lu; Pedro T Ramirez Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Kavita D Chandwani; Fengmin Zhao; Gary R Morrow; Teresa L Deshields; Lori M Minasian; Judith Manola; Michael J Fisch Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Johnny M Hoang; Navneet Upadhyay; Dozie N Dike; Jaekyu Lee; Michael L Johnson; Charles S Cleeland; Tito Mendoza; Hua Chen; Meghana V Trivedi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael J Fisch; Fengmin Zhao; Judith Manola; Andrew H Miller; William F Pirl; Lynne I Wagner Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Lilit Flöther; Barabara Pötzsch; Maria Jung; Robert Jung; Michael Bucher; André Glowka; Daniel Medenwald Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 1.817