Literature DB >> 2073453

Limb lengthening and three-dimensional deformity corrections. A retrospective clinical study.

K Korzinek1, S Tepic, S M Perren.   

Abstract

Different methods of limb lengthening as used at the Orthopedic Surgery Clinic of the Medical School, University of Zagreb, are compared. The results of operations performed between 1979 and 1989 on 111 patients are presented. These patients were subjected to surgery aimed at length equalization of limbs and/or correction of three-dimensional deformities. Lengthening was performed in 104 patients at one level, and in 7 patients at two levels of the same limb for a total of 118 procedures. In order to compare limb lengthening techniques the patients were divided into four groups: group I, original Wagner technique (45 patients); group II, Wagner technique using corticotomy (33 patients); group III, original Ilizarov technique (35 patients); group IV, continuous lengthening (2 patients). The evaluation covered radiological aspects of regenerated bone, complications and basic lengthening parameters. The results indicate that corticotomy has considerable advantages over osteotomy, provided bone circulation is maintained. These advantages manifest themselves in a reduced number of operations, lower incidence of infection and improved bone regeneration. It is preferable to perform corticotomy at the metaphysis site because of its optimum blood supply and its higher potential for osteogenesis. With corticotomy performed at the diaphysis site, satisfactory results were observed in only one-third of the cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2073453     DOI: 10.1007/BF00636172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bone regenerate formation in cortical bone during distraction lengthening. An experimental study.

Authors:  C Delloye; G Delefortrie; L Coutelier; A Vincent
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Stiffness characteristics of the circular Ilizarov device as opposed to conventional external fixators.

Authors:  B Gasser; B Boman; D Wyder; E Schneider
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Anderson's method of tibial-lengthening by percutaneous osteotomy and gradual distraction. Experience with thirty-one cases.

Authors:  S S Coleman; T D Noonan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  An evaluation of tibial lengthening procedures.

Authors:  R H Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique.

Authors:  D Paley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The principles and technique of limb lengthening.

Authors:  B Kawamura; S Hosono; T Takahashi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Mechanical evaluation of external fixators used in limb lengthening.

Authors:  D Paley; B Fleming; M Catagni; T Kristiansen; M Pope
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures.

Authors:  A E Goodship; J Kenwright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-08
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Bone lengthening (distraction osteogenesis): a literature review.

Authors:  F Sailhan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Complications of bone lengthening.

Authors:  J D Aquerreta; F Forriol; J Cañadell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  War injuries to the bone and joint system: reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  K Korzinek
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  EGFL6 regulates angiogenesis and osteogenesis in distraction osteogenesis via Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Authors:  Junjie Shen; Yi Sun; Xuanzhe Liu; Yu Zhu; Bingbo Bao; Tao Gao; Yimin Chai; Jia Xu; Xianyou Zheng
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 6.832

5.  Percutaneous CO2 Treatment Accelerates Bone Generation During Distraction Osteogenesis in Rabbits.

Authors:  Yohei Kumabe; Tomoaki Fukui; Shunsuke Takahara; Yu Kuroiwa; Michio Arakura; Keisuke Oe; Takahiro Oda; Kenichi Sawauchi; Takehiko Matsushita; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Shinya Hayashi; Ryosuke Kuroda; Takahiro Niikura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation.

Authors:  Ji-Beom Kim; Dong Yeon Lee; Sang Gyo Seo; Eo Jin Kim; Ji Hye Kim; Won Joon Yoo; Tae-Joon Cho; In Ho Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.