Literature DB >> 20732495

Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability?

Tirone E David1, Susan Armstrong, Manjula Maganti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the long-term durability of the Hancock II bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) in the aortic position.
METHODS: From 1982 to 2004, 1134 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with Hancock II bioprosthesis and were prospectively monitored. Mean patient age was 67 +/- 11 years; 202 patients were younger than 60, 402 were 60 to 70, and 526 were older than 70. Median follow-up was 12.2 years and 99.2% complete. Valve function was assessed in 94% of patients. Freedom from adverse events was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Survival at 20 and 25 years was 19.2% +/- 2% and 6.7% +/- 2.8%, respectively, with only 34 and 3 patients at risk. Survival at 20 years was 54.9% +/- 6.4% in patients younger than 60 years, 22.7% +/- 3.3% in those 60 to 70, and 2.4% +/- 1.9% in those older than 70 (p = 0.01). Structural valve deterioration developed in 67 patients aged younger than 60, in 18 patients aged 60 to 70, and in 2 patients older than 70. The freedom from structural valve deterioration at 20 years was 63.4% +/- 4.2% in the entire cohort, 29.2% +/- 5.7% in patients younger than 60 years, 85.2% +/- 3.7% in patients aged 60 to 70, and 99.8% +/- 0.2% in patients older than 70 (truncated at 18 years). Repeat AVR was performed in 104 patients (74 for structural valve failure, 16 for endocarditis, and 14 for other reasons). At 20 years, the overall freedom from AVR was 65.1% +/- 4% for any reason, 29.8% +/- 5.4% in patients younger than 60 years, 86.8% +/- 3.3% in patients 60 to 70, and 98.3% +/- 0.6% in patients older than 70.
CONCLUSIONS: Hancock II bioprosthesis is a very durable valve in patients 60 years and older and is probably the gold standard of bioprosthetic valve durability in this patient population. 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20732495     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  36 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Biological Heart Valves.

Authors:  Sami Kueri; Fabian A Kari; Rafael Ayala Fuentes; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Wolfgang Bothe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  A clinical commentary on the article "EMT-inducing biomaterials for heart valve engineering: taking cues from developmental biology" : clinical utilization of tissue-engineered heart valves--meeting today's standard.

Authors:  Bret Mettler
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a telltale from the young.

Authors:  Athanasios Antoniou; Amer Harky; John Yap; Kulvinder Lall; Mohamad Bashir
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

4.  Single-centre experience of 101 paediatric and adult Ross procedures: mid-term results.

Authors:  Angela McBrien; Milind Chaudhari; David S Crossland; Helen Aspey; Alison Heads-Baister; Massimo Griselli; John O'Sullivan; Asif Hasan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-22

5.  Comparison of radial deformability of stent posts of different aortic bioprostheses.

Authors:  Martins Kalejs; Romans Lacis; Vladimir Kasyanov; Iveta Ozolanta; Philippe Abdel Sayed; Peteris Stradins; Ludwig Karl von Segesser
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-11-01

6.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hersh S Maniar; Alan Zojarias
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

7.  Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit?

Authors:  Lars Niclauss; Ludwig Karl von Segesser; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-03

8.  eComment. Choice of bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Georgios Dimitrakakis; Ulrich O von Oppell
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-03

Review 9.  Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Richard L Li; Jonathan Russ; Costas Paschalides; Giovanni Ferrari; Haim Waisman; Jeffrey W Kysar; David Kalfa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.