Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a telltale from the young.

Literature DB >> 29951507

Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a telltale from the young.

Athanasios Antoniou¹, Amer Harky¹, John Yap¹, Kulvinder Lall¹, Mohamad Bashir¹.

Abstract

Year: 2018 PMID： 29951507 PMCID： PMC5994523 DOI： 10.21037/atm.2018.02.19

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN： 2305-5839

× No keyword cloud information.

14 in total

1. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial.

Authors: K Hammermeister; G K Sethi; W G Henderson; F L Grover; C Oprian; S H Rahimtoola
Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 24.094

2. Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves　- A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors: Kenji Minakata; Shiro Tanaka; Nobushige Tamura; Shigeki Yanagi; Yohei Ohkawa; Shuichi Okonogi; Tatsuo Kaneko; Akihiko Usui; Tomonobu Abe; Mitsuomi Shimamoto; Yoshiharu Takahara; Kazuo Yamanaka; Hitoshi Yaku; Ryuzo Sakata
Journal: Circ J Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 2.993

3. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors: Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Lee A Fleisher; Hani Jneid; Michael J Mack; Christopher J McLeod; Patrick T O'Gara; Vera H Rigolin; Thoralf M Sundt; Annemarie Thompson
Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 24.094

4. Long-Term Outcomes of the Ross Procedure Versus Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors: Amine Mazine; Tirone E David; Vivek Rao; Edward J Hickey; Shakira Christie; Cedric Manlhiot; Maral Ouzounian
Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 29.690

5. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.

Authors: Alberto Weber; Hassan Noureddine; Lars Englberger; Florian Dick; Brigitta Gahl; Thierry Aymard; Martin Czerny; Hendrik Tevaearai; Mario Stalder; Thierry Pierre Carrel
Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 5.209

Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a telltale from the young.

1. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial.

2. Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves　- A Propensity Score Analysis.

3. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

4. Long-Term Outcomes of the Ross Procedure Versus Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

5. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.

6. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years.

7. Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability?

8. Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures.

9. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.

10. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.

1. A single-center 14-year follow-up study of the BalMedic^® bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valve.