Literature DB >> 23400537

eComment. Choice of bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement.

Georgios Dimitrakakis1, Ulrich O von Oppell.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23400537      PMCID： PMC3568833          DOI： 10.1093/icvts/ivt007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN： 1569-9285


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Farhad Bakhtiary; Omer Dzemali; Ulrich Steinseiffer; Christof Schmitz; Birgit Glasmacher; Anton Moritz; Peter Kleine
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability?

Authors:  Tirone E David; Susan Armstrong; Manjula Maganti
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Aortic annulus diameter and valve design each determine the valve size implanted.

Authors:  Ulrich O von Oppell; Leidulf Segadal; Rolf Busund; G Gilbert Johnston; George Dimitrakakis; Navroz Masani; Te-Hsin Lung
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update.

Authors:  Shahbudin H Rahimtoola
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better?

Authors:  Kok Hooi Yap; Ralph Murphy; Mohan Devbhandari; Rajamiyer Venkateswaran
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.